Search Results for "excess pay recovery"

835 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 835 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Employee in Excess Payment Recovery Case — Recovery from Pension Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension quashed as no opportunity of hearing was given before ordering recovery.

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer Statistics by the respondent no.5 on 19.10.1994. He was granted higher p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Excess Payment Case — Recovery from Pension Without Opportunity of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension of retired Extension Officer set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer (Statistics) by the Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon on 19.10.1994. He was grante...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Teacher Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary from Gratuity. Recovery of Rs.1,39,316/- Set Aside as Payment Was Due to Departmental Error Without Misrepresentation by Employee.

The petitioner, Ashok Buchayya Pusalwar, was an Assistant Teacher with the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, appointed on 24-10-1996. He voluntarily retired...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay in Ordnance Factory Case. Recovery of Excess Amount Paid Due to Employer's Mistake Held Impermissible When Employees Are in Same or Higher Pay Scale and No Misrepresentation Is Involved.

The petitioners, employees of Ordnance Factory Bhandara, were granted a higher pay scale by the employer. Subsequently, the employer sought to recover...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Bank Entitled to Recover Debt Under RDB Act. DRT Has Inherent Power to Reject Frivolous Counterclaim Without Recording Evidence, and High Court Should Not Interfere When Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Fin...