Search Results for "enhanced award"

2249 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2249 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Writ Petition Challenging Section 28-A Award as Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy. Acquiring Body Cannot Seek Reference Under Section 28-A(3) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Not a 'Person Interested' and Is Barred by Section 50(2).

The Bombay High Court dealt with three writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited, the acquiring body for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition and Corrigendum in Land Acquisition Matter — Restoration of Status Quo Ante Ordered. Court held that demolition without notice and corrigendum reducing compensation without opportunity of hearing violated principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, Prakash G. Patel and Kalpanaben Prakashbhai Patel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the illegal partial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reduces Compensation for Agricultural Land. Court Determines Market Value Based on Potential for Horticulture and Nearby Sale Instances, Applying Deductions for Development.

The case pertains to an appeal by the State of Maharashtra and a cross objection by the claimants (legal heirs of the original landowner) against the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Remission of Arbitral Award for De Novo Consideration Due to Jurisdictional Error. Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Claims Not Raised Before Chief Engineer and Commissioner Under Contractual Pre-Arbitration Procedure.

The appellant, Biwater Penstocks Ltd., a UK-based company, entered into a contract with the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (first respondent)...