Search Results for "employees compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "employees compensation"

1545 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1545 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Dependents of Deceased Driver Under Employees Compensation Act — Death During Course of Employment Despite Alleged Termination and Drunkenness. Employer Failed to Prove Termination; Accident Held to Arise Out of Employment Under Section 22 of Employees Compensation Act, 1923.

28 Jan 2016

The appellants, being the widow, minor daughter, and parents of deceased Prakash Madavi, filed an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Case — Relevant Date for Determination of Rights and Liabilities Under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is Date of Accident. The Court held that compensation must be computed based on wages and age at the time of accident, not at adjudication, and directed payment of interest and penalty.

25 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment dated 29.04.1998 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation at Ahmednagar in W.C.A. No.85 of 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal on Interest Period in Employees Compensation Case — Interest Must Run from Date of Accident Under Section 4A(3)(a) of Employees Compensation Act, 1923. The court held that when compensation is not paid within one month of falling due, interest under Section 4A(3)(a) must be awarded from the date of accident, not from the date of award.

30 Jan 2014

The appellants, parents of deceased Suresh Tiwade, filed an application under Section 22(2) of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 before the Labour ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Right to Claim Both Gratuity and Retrenchment Compensation; Section 25F(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, interpreted to allow dual benefits.

16 Oct 1959

The dispute originated from an industrial reference between the Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. and its workmen concerning a claim for gratuity. The employe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Death of Employee Who Died of Heart Attack While on Leave. The court held that the death did not arise out of and in the course of employment under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, as the employee was on leave and not performing any work-related duties.

13 Apr 2016

The appellant, the Manager of Bedse Pulp Conversion Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court which awarded compensation to the r...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case — Upholds Award to Dependents of Deceased Worker. Employer's Liability Affirmed Under Section 30 of Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, with Contractor's Reimbursement Liability Limited to Amount Payable by Employer.

14 Oct 2015

The case arises from a claim for compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the widow and minor son of a deceased worker, Band...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurer Liable Jointly and Severally with Employer for Employee's Injuries. Employer's Failure to Deposit Compensation Attracts Penalty Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

3 Jan 2020

The case involves an appeal by National Insurance Co. Ltd. against a judgment of the learned Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation and Judge, Elev...

High Court

High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.

26 Oct 2016

The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order for Full Back Wages and Retrenchment Compensation to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Company's Claim of Financial Difficulty and Closure Not Sufficient to Deny Workmen's Entitlement Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

31 Mar 2006

The petitioner, D.G.P.Windsor (India) Ltd., challenged an order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane in Complaint (ULP) No....

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Employees' Compensation Act Case — Employer's Failure to Produce Attendance Register Leads to Adverse Inference. Commissioner's denial of compensation for loss of earning capacity due to non-production of attendance register and lack of cross-examination of doctor is set aside.

24 Apr 2019

The appellant, Munmahesh s/o Ramkhilawan Gupta, was the original claimant in a proceeding under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, seeking compens...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)