COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017
28 Jan 2020The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...
Search Results for "disputed interest"
6783 result(s) found
Found 6783 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition in Family Property Dispute — Settlement Agreement Binding, Third Party Claims Based on Agreement to Sell Not Recognized. The Court held that the contempt petition is premature as execution proceedings are ongoing, and an agreement to sell does not confer title under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
25 Nov 2019The present contempt petition was filed by Kaushaliya against her father Jodha Ram and others for alleged non-compliance of the Supreme Court's order ...
- 190
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation Dispute, Remands Suit for Trial on Merits. Issue of limitation cannot be decided as preliminary issue under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC when facts are disputed and require evidence.
14 Feb 2022The appellant, M/s Mongia Realty and Buildwell Private Limited, instituted a suit against the respondent, Manik Sethi, on 31 March 2017 under Order 37...
- 358
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Third Party Objections Rejected for Lack of Evidence. Appellants failed to prove independent possession prior to attachment under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC, resulting in dismissal of objections and restoration of possession to decree holder.
18 Dec 2014The case arises from execution proceedings initiated by Respondent No. 1 (decree holder) against Respondent No. 2 (judgment debtor). The appellants, c...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on limitation and quantum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
27 Nov 2012The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 20 February 2009 passed by a s...
- 79
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Prior Agreement of Sale as No Valid Contract Existed. The court held that the Official Assignee has the power to sell the insolvent's property free from an alleged agreement of sale that was not valid or enforceable under the Presidency Town Insolvency Act, 1909.
27 Feb 2026The case involves an appeal filed by the Official Assignee of the High Court of Madras, representing the estate of Arjunlal Sunderdas (the insolvent),...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.
20 Oct 2016The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting grounds of patent illegality and public policy.
14 Mar 2013The petitioners, Pradyuman Kumar Sharma and Kuber Planters Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeal Challenging Declaration of Partition Deed as Null and Void. Partition Deed Executed Without Consent of All Co-Owners and Without Legal Necessity is Void Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963.
23 Dec 2016The case involves a family property dispute among the heirs of Hyder Kassim Khan. The plaintiffs, including the widow and son of one of the brothers, ...
- 182
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor in IBC Section 9 Case — Pre-Existing Dispute Regarding Quality of Services Bars CIRP Initiation. The dispute regarding quality of transportation services raised by the Corporate Debtor prior to the demand notice constitutes a pre-existing dispute under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the Adjudicating Authority correctly dismissed the application.
4 Sep 2024The appeal was filed by Union Roadways Limited (Operational Creditor) against Ice Steel 1 Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the I...
- 137
