Search Results for "development plan rejection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "development plan rejection"

506 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Directs Municipal Commissioner to File Affidavit on Inability to Acquire Reserved Land Due to Financial Constraints. Court Raises Concerns That Municipal Corporation's Admission of Inability May Render Development Plan Reservations Otiose Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

31 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a company owning land in Solapur reserved for a playground under the development plan, sought a declaration that the reservation lapse...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Regularize Building Irregularities under MRTP Act. The Court examined the validity of orders passed under Sections 45 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, concerning unauthorized construction and occupation certificate refusal.

11 Jun 2012

The matter involved writ petitions challenging the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited's (CIDCO) rejection of a regular...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation for Primary School Under Section 127 MRTP Act Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. The Court held that failure of Nagpur Municipal Corporation to acquire reserved land within ten years results in automatic lapsing of reservation, entitling landowner to declaration and notification under Section 127(2) of MRTP Act.

9 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Urban Township Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, owned two parcels of land admeasuring 4907 sq.mtrs. an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Direction to Reconsider Development Permission in MRTP Act Appeal — Minister Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 47 by Converting Appeal into Representation. The Court Held That the Minister Cannot Issue Directions Beyond the Scope of the Statutory Appeal and Must Decide the Appeal on Merits.

1 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Sunil Balakrushna Telang, owned plot nos. 11 and 12 in a private layout in Survey No.110, Village Ravet, within the Pimpri Chinchwad M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Purchase Notice Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 — Land Reserved for Public Purpose Becomes Unusable. Failure of Planning Authority to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period Entities Owner to Serve Purchase Notice and Seek De-Reservation.

2 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Manoj Murlimanohar Khandelwal and Manish Murlimanohar Khandelwal, are owners of 0.20 H.R. of land in Survey No.106/2 of Village Darya...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Amenity Space Computation Dispute — D.P. Road Area Must Be Adjusted Against Total Amenity Space Under DCR 57(4)(c)(ii). The court held that the Municipal Corporation's refusal to sanction plans based on a misinterpretation of DCR 57(4)(c)(ii) and Note II was arbitrary and unsustainable.

5 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Atul Projects India Pvt Ltd, a developer, owned a plot of land in Mumbai and submitted development plans to the Municipal Corporation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

5 May 2026

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Sanction Procedure Under D.C. Regulations. Court Considers Whether First Come First Serve Principle Applies to Competing Applications for Slum Redevelopment Under Regulation 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for the City of Mumbai, 1991.

26 Apr 2006

The petitioners, a proposed co-operative housing society of hutment dwellers residing on a plot of land measuring about 15,600 sq. mtrs. in Malad, Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Right Certificate Issued to Developer. Court holds that issuance of DRC under MRTP Act was valid and no loss to public exchequer was caused.

8 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Mr. Manoj Jaswantlal Kapadia, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the issuance of a Developmen...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)