Search Results for "deposit collectors"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "deposit collectors"

56 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

High Court

High Court Directs State to Complete Land Acquisition and Pay Compensation After 30-Year Delay -- Systemic Negligence in Land Acquisition Process Addressed in Writ Petition

17 Feb 2026

The petitioners, landowners from Beed district, filed a writ petition after their lands were taken into possession in 1996 for a village tank project,...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...

High Court

KAHC010306442014_1

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

WRIT PETITION No. 4045 OF 2005

10 Dec 2013

The matter arises from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, a local authority...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Interest Calculation Upheld. The court affirmed that compensation for land acquired under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 must include interest at 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till recovery, as per the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

8 Feb 2011

The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector, Chandrapur, filed a First Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31.3.1994 passed by the learne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CEGAT Order for Non-Consideration of Submissions in Customs Seizure Case. Tribunal's Order Held Invalid as It Did Not Constitute a Decision in the Eye of Law Under Customs Act, 1962.

25 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Wall Street Finance Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3rd February, 2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and G...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)