Search Results for "customs tariff classification"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Classification of Plant Growth Promoters as Excisable Goods Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Products Containing NPK as Essential Constituent Classified as 'Other Fertilizers' Under Note 6 Chapter 3105, Attracting 1% Duty.

The petitioners, Dharti Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 8 March 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union's Appeal Against High Court's Setting Aside of Amended Customs Notification. Power to Modify Exemption Under Section 25(1) Customs Act, 1962 Includes Power to Withdraw; No Vested Right to Concessional Duty.

The case involves a challenge to the amendment of a customs exemption notification. The respondent, ABP Pvt Ltd, imported a high-speed printing machin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Writ Petition in Apple Watch Band Classification Dispute Under Section 28-I of Customs Act, 1962. Renewal Application for Advance Ruling Rejected Due to Pending Show Cause Notice; Petitioner Argues Pendency Must Exist on Application Date.

The litigation arose from a customs classification dispute concerning Apple Watch Bands imported by the petitioner, a company incorporated in India. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Octroi Duty Classification of Rubber Goods. Court Directs Development Commissioner's Opinion on Commercial Identity and Trade Usage of Imported Items Under Maharashtra Municipality Octroi Rules.

The writ petition was filed by Ceat Tyres of India Ltd., a tyre manufacturer, challenging octroi duty demand notices issued by the Nashik Municipal Co...