Search Results for "consumer protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "consumer protection"

658 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 658 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case and Remands to NCDRC for Merits Decision. The Court held that deposit of surplus funds in a fixed deposit by a company does not automatically constitute commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, requiring examination of dominant intention, and allegations of fraud do not oust consumer forum jurisdiction if deficiency in service is alleged.

19 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment and order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 13.03.2023, which dismissed the appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Return of Shares and Dividends in Commercial Suit — Plaintiff Stockbroker Entitled to 11,25,000 ITC Shares and Accrued Dividends After Full Satisfaction of Debt Under One Time Settlement. Court Holds That Once Debt Is Fully Satisfied, Bank Must Return All Pledged Securities and Cannot Retain Them as Collateral for Other Debts.

10 Mar 2025

The Plaintiff, Shrikant G. Mantri, a stockbroker and registered member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, filed a commercial suit against Punjab National B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Commercial Purpose' Under Consumer Protection Act for Company Purchases for Director Use. The Court held that purchase of a vehicle by a company for personal use of its directors does not amount to commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

9 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of 'commercial purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-Appointment of District Consumer Commission President Despite Tenure Expiry — Rules of 2020 Declared Unconstitutional, Petitioner Entitled to Consideration Under Pre-Existing Rules. The court directed the State to consider the petitioner's application for re-appointment under the Model Rules, 2012, as the Rules of 2020 were struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Mrs. Suhas Milind Untwale, was appointed as President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Buldana on 06.02.2013. U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-appointment of District Consumer Commission President After Unconstitutional Rules Struck Down — Petitioner Entitled to Consideration Under Pre-2020 Rules. The Court directed the State to consider the petitioner's application for re-appointment as President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under the Model Rules, 2012, after the Rules of 2020 were declared unconstitutional.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Mrs. Suhas Milind Untwale, was appointed as President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Buldana on 06.02.2013. A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against NCDRC Order Condoning Delay in Filing Written Statement — Prospective Application of Limitation Period Under Section 13 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court held that the NCDRC's discretion exercised before the Constitution Bench judgment in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. was valid and not liable to be interfered with.

14 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 25 February 2020, which condoned a delay of 100 da...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revision Petition in Consumer Execution Proceedings. Holds that Execution is Continuation of Consumer Dispute Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

6 May 2019

The present Civil Appeal arose out of execution proceedings initiated by the Respondent-Complainant, K. A. Nagamani, against the Appellant, Karnataka ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Consumer Forum Notice Against Restaurant Company for Lack of Consumer Relationship. Petitioner Company not a 'Consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as the respondent was not a consumer of its services.

27 Dec 2013

The petitioner, M/s Vasudeva Adiga's Fast Food Pvt Ltd, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, running vegetarian restaurants in Bangal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

18 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)