Search Results for "compulsory purchase order"

390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes LAO's Apportionment Order in Highway Acquisition — Directs Reference to Civil Court Under Section 19C(4) of Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Dispute over compensation apportionment between partnership firm and its individual partners requires adjudication by civil court, not LAO.

The petitioners, Pravin Girish Chamaria and Nishit Bechar Patel, along with respondents 4 and 5 (Dilip Prabhakar Kudalkar and Jagdish Shashikumar Raje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.

The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Employee in Kadamba Transport Corporation Case — Retirement Held Punitive Without Inquiry. Resolution No. 71 of 2007 Set Aside as Board Failed to Record Satisfaction of Inefficiency Under Service Rules.

The petitioner, Mahesh Prabhakar Kamat, was appointed as Accountant in the Kadamba Transport Corporation Limited on 13 December 1982. He was promoted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Dispute Over Delayed Payment of Purchase Price. Belated payment with interest and penalty before landlord's application does not render sale ineffective under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, Baburao Pandurang Madane and Vithal Pandurang Madane, were tenants of agricultural land survey No. 39/1 at village Kusmod, Taluka Mal...