Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under MOFA, 1963 — Orders Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. The Competent Authority under Section 5A of MOFA, 1963 cannot adjudicate title or possession of land, and must follow principles of natural justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment involves two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 180 of 2018 filed by Marathon Era Co-operative Housing Society Ltd and Writ Petition No. 295 of 2015 filed by Gulmohar Lokmilan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd and another. The petitioners challenged orders passed by the Competent Authority appointed under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (MOFA). The Competent Authority had passed orders directing the petitioners to hand over possession of certain properties to the respondents, without giving the petitioners an opportunity of being heard. The petitioners contended that the Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction to pass such orders as the disputes involved title and possession of land, which are outside the scope of Section 5A of MOFA. The respondents argued that the Competent Authority had jurisdiction under Section 5A to decide disputes arising out of agreements for sale of flats. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 5A of MOFA and held that the Competent Authority's jurisdiction is limited to disputes arising out of agreements for sale of flats and does not extend to deciding questions of title or possession of land. The court further held that the orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice as the petitioners were not heard before the orders were passed. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned orders and allowed the writ petitions. The court also directed that any further proceedings before the Competent Authority shall be conducted in accordance with law and after giving due opportunity of hearing to all affected parties.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Orders passed without hearing affected parties are void ab initio - The Competent Authority under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 passed orders affecting the rights of the petitioners without giving them an opportunity of being heard - Held that such orders are in violation of principles of natural justice and are liable to be quashed (Paras 10-15).

B) Jurisdiction - Competent Authority under Section 5A of MOFA, 1963 - Scope of powers - The Competent Authority can only adjudicate disputes arising out of agreements for sale of flats and cannot decide questions of title or possession of land - The impugned orders purported to decide title and possession of land, which is beyond the jurisdiction of the Competent Authority - Held that the orders are without jurisdiction and are quashed (Paras 16-20).

C) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 - Maintainability - The petitioners challenged the orders of the Competent Authority under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice - Held that writ petitions are maintainable as the orders are patently illegal and without jurisdiction (Paras 21-25).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Competent Authority under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 has jurisdiction to pass orders affecting rights of parties without hearing them, and whether such orders can be challenged under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed both writ petitions, quashed the impugned orders passed by the Competent Authority, and directed that any further proceedings before the Competent Authority shall be conducted in accordance with law and after giving due opportunity of hearing to all affected parties.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of Competent Authority under Section 5A of MOFA
  • 1963 is limited to disputes arising out of agreements for sale of flats
  • not title or possession of land
  • Principles of natural justice must be followed before passing any order
  • Orders passed without hearing affected parties are void ab initio
  • Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 can be invoked against orders of Competent Authority if they are without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (04) 98

Writ Petition No. 180 of 2018 and Writ Petition No. 295 of 2015

2024-04-18

2024:BHC-AS:17902

Mr DJ Khambata, Senior Advocate, with CS Balsara, Ali Antulay, NH Vakil & Suzan Vakil, i/b Mulla & Mulla & Craigie, Blunt & Caroe (for petitioner in WP 180/2018); Mr Pravin Samdani, Senior Advocate, with Karl Tamboly, Bindi Dave, Raghor Gupta & Kashish Mainkar, i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co (for respondents 2 and 3); Mr Vivek Kantawala, with Amey Patil, & Shanay Bafna, i/b M/s Vivek Kantawala & Co. (for respondent no 5); Mr BM Chatterjee, Senior Advocate, with Pooja Yadav, for MCGM (respondent no 6)

Marathon Era Co-operative Housing Society Ltd (in WP 180/2018); Gulmohar Lokmilan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd & Anr (in WP 295/2015)

The Competent Authority & District Dy. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai & Ors (in WP 180/2018); The Competent Authority, Appointed under Section 5A of MOFA, 1963 & Ors (in WP 295/2015)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Competent Authority under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned orders passed by the Competent Authority and a direction to the Competent Authority to decide the matter afresh after hearing the petitioners.

Filing Reason

The Competent Authority passed orders affecting the rights of the petitioners without giving them an opportunity of being heard and without jurisdiction.

Previous Decisions

The Competent Authority passed orders directing the petitioners to hand over possession of properties to the respondents.

Issues

Whether the Competent Authority under Section 5A of MOFA, 1963 has jurisdiction to pass orders affecting title and possession of land? Whether the impugned orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice? Whether the writ petitions under Article 226 are maintainable against such orders?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction to decide disputes relating to title and possession of land, and that the orders were passed without hearing them, violating natural justice. Respondents argued that the Competent Authority had jurisdiction under Section 5A of MOFA to decide disputes arising out of agreements for sale of flats, and that the petitioners were not entitled to be heard as they were not parties to the agreements.

Ratio Decidendi

The Competent Authority under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 has limited jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of agreements for sale of flats and cannot decide questions of title or possession of land. Any order passed without jurisdiction or in violation of principles of natural justice is void ab initio and can be challenged under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment Excerpts

The Competent Authority under Section 5A of the MOFA, 1963 has no jurisdiction to decide questions of title or possession of land. The impugned orders were passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, which is a clear violation of principles of natural justice. The writ petitions are maintainable as the orders are patently illegal and without jurisdiction.

Procedural History

The Competent Authority passed orders in proceedings under Section 5A of MOFA, 1963. The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging those orders. The High Court heard both petitions together and delivered a common judgment on 18th April 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963: Section 5A
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Decree Holder's Appeal in Execution of Foreign Money Decree Under Section 44A CPC. High Court of Delhi Held to Have Jurisdiction as Principal Civil Court of Original Jurisdiction When Decretal Amount Exceeds Pecuniary Limits Unde...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under MOFA, 1963 — Orders Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. The Competent Authority under Section 5A of MOFA, 1963 cannot adjudicate t...