Search Results for "collision"

340 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 340 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304(A) and 337 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove rash and negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shivaji Santu Zanzad, a driver of a PMT bus, challenging his conviction under Sections 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim, Restoring Compensation Based on Income Tax Returns. Income Tax Returns and Audit Reports Held Reliable Evidence for Determining Loss of Income Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Overturning High Court's Use of Notional Income.

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising from a motor vehicle accident claim. The deceased, a businessman aged above 31 years, died in a collisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Owner of Goods Travelling in Goods Vehicle Not a Gratuitous Passenger. Insurer Liable Under Section 110A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 for Death of Goods Owner in Collision Between Tempo and Truck.

The case arises from a motor accident on 15th April 1988 at Swargate, Pune, where the deceased Balkrishna was waiting with his luggage. The driver of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Overtaking — State Fails to Prove Negligence in Head-On Collision Between Two Mini Buses Under Sections 279, 337 IPC.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of the accused, Mohandas S. Gawade, who was charged under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 337 (causing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Driver for Gross Negligence Causing Fatal Accident. Disciplinary Enquiry Valid Despite Acquittal in Criminal Case as Standard of Proof Differs.

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) through its BEST Undertaking challenged a Labour Court order that set aside the dismissal of a bus driver...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Railway Driver Challenging Revision of Penalty from Reversion to Removal. Revision under Rule 25(1) of Railway Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 Upheld as Valid and Procedurally Fair.

The petitioner, Mohmed Usman Abdul Bari, was a Class IV employee of the Central Railway who was promoted to driver grade C on 8.10.1992. On 16.2.1993,...