Search Results for "claimant"

4491 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4491 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Appreciation of Evidence by Tribunal. Claimant Proves Rash and Negligent Driving Through Panchanama and Witness Testimony Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shri Anant Sahadev Parsekar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to No Loss of Earning Capacity. Claimant's 20% disability did not result in any reduction in salary, so compensation for loss of earning capacity was set aside.

The case involves an appeal by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 02.06.2010 of the Motor Accident Claims T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Claimant's income reassessed and compensation enhanced for loss of future income, pain and suffering, and medical expenses under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Mr. M. Raju, a 25-year-old vegetable vendor, sustained grievous injur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Amputation of Both Legs Due to Fall from Train. Held that the claimant was a bona fide passenger and the incident was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling him to compensation.

The appellant, Nagesh Gulabrao Kale, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, for injuries sustained in an untoward ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Driver. Claimant awarded compensation for injuries sustained when motorcycle hit her while she was loading luggage on a tempo.

The appellant, Nalini Ramesh Satarkar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 for injuries sus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Evidence on Income. Claimant failed to prove permanent disability and loss of earning capacity, leading to reduction of award from Rs. 1,23,000 to Rs. 80,000 with interest at 6% p.a.

The case involves a motor accident claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The claimant, Parvez Framroz Billimoria, was injured on 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Claimant Injured as Pillion on Bicycle Hit by APSRTC Bus. Compensation Enhanced for Pain, Suffering, and Medical Expenses Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The claimant, Suresh Naik, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Appreciation of Evidence. Negligence of Driver Established Through Oral Testimony and Site Inspection Report, Entitling Claimant to Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Laximan Vithoba Gaunkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00,000...