Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

3564 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3564 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Suit for Possession in Rent Control Case — Limitation Governed by Article 67 of Limitation Act, 1963. Suit Filed Within 12 Years from Termination of Tenancy by Notice is Maintainable.

7 Dec 2011

The case involves a dispute between a landlady (since deceased, represented by heirs) and a tenant (since deceased, represented by heirs) regarding po...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Recovery Suit Based on Deposit Receipt, Holds Article 23 of Limitation Act Applies. Suit for recovery of money based on a deposit receipt executed in 1956 is governed by Article 23 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which prescribes limitation from the date of demand, not Article 113.

13 Dec 2017

The present second appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 25.04.2000 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Amravati in Regular Civi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Validity of Sale Deed. Suit for Possession Based on Prior Agreement to Sell Held Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Notice of Eviction, Not Registration of Sale Deed.

11 Jul 2019

The case involves a property dispute where the original plaintiff (now represented by legal heirs) filed a suit for possession based on an agreement t...

High Court

Resolving Complexities in a Civil Suit for Partition. Limitation Issues, Res Judicata, and Legislative Amendments in Judicial Proceedings.

10 Jun 2024

The legal dispute involving a civil suit for partition and related claims, focusing on the issue of limitation under Section 9-A of the CPC. It explor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Challenge as Barred by Limitation — Section 4 of Limitation Act Does Not Extend 30-Day Condonable Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act When It Expires During Court Vacation. The Court held that Section 4 of the Limitation Act applies only to the 3-month prescribed period, not to the 30-day condonable period under the proviso to Section 34(3), and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act is inapplicable.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves an appeal by My Preferred Trans Formation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and another against M/s Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd. arising fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation. Notice under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 issued in 1994; suit filed in 2001 held time-barred as cause of action arose on notice date.

16 Jun 2005

The appellant, Satish Dalichand Shah, claimed to be a monthly tenant of a shop premises in Mumbai. On 23rd May, 1994, the Municipal Corporation of Gre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Reference on Interpretation of Section 9A CPC (Maharashtra Amendment) — Jurisdiction Includes Limitation. The court examines whether the expression 'jurisdiction of the Court to entertain such suit' under Section 9A includes the issue of limitation, doubting the correctness of Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society v. Praveen D. Desai.

4 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered a reference made by a Division Bench doubting the correctness of the decision in Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Held that Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and is Not Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as the suit is within limitation and discloses a cause of action.

16 Jul 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Defendant No. 11, Lily Realty Private Limited, in a suit for specific performance and injunction. The pl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Commercial Suit, Rejecting Limitation Bar Under Article 137. Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Held Inapplicable to Applications for Amendment of Pleadings, Allowing Defendants to Elaborate Existing Defences.

7 Dec 2011

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by defendant nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 in Suit No. 2256 of 1998 pending before the Bombay High Court. The defe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Loan Recovery Case — Suit for Recovery of Loan Secured by Registered Charge Governed by Article 62 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that a suit for recovery of loan secured by a registered charge on property is governed by Article 62 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which provides a 12-year limitation period from the date the money becomes due, and not by Article 19 or 37.

13 Feb 2006

The appellant, State Bank of India, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 16,179.49 against the respondents, Ramkrishna and Himmatrao Sakharkar, based on a...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)