Special Court at Bombay Hears Special Case No. 1 of 2002 Under the Special Court Act, 1992. No further details available from the provided excerpt.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "authorised representative"
1127 result(s) found
Found 1127 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of District Central Co-operative Bank in Share Transfer Dispute Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Single Judge’s Direction to Transfer Shares to Nominees of Deceased Member Upheld, Rejecting Bank’s Reliance on RBI Policy Over Statutory Mandate Under Section 30.
17 Nov 2021The dispute arose from the refusal of the Gondia District Central Co-operative Bank to transfer 20 shares held by deceased member Shankarlal Agrawal t...
- 14
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.
1 Mar 2018The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Bombay Delivers Judgment on Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 13424 of 2026
18 Jun 2026The matter pertained to a commercial arbitration petition filed by the developer, Wadhwa Estates and Developers (India) Private Limited, against respo...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Goods Vehicle Passengers Not Covered Under Policy. Deceased were unauthorized passengers in a goods vehicle, hence insurer not liable under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
27 Sep 2013The case involves two first appeals filed by the New India Assurance Company Ltd. challenging the judgments and awards dated 16-06-2010 passed by the ...
- 67
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Company and Managing Director for Foreign Exchange Violations. Complaint Invalid as Director of Enforcement Failed to Comply with Proviso to Section 23D(1) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act Requiring Finding that Penalty in Adjudication Proceedings Would be Inadequate; Prosecution Under Rule 132A Also Incompetent After Rule Was Omitted.
23 Jul 1969The Rayala Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, M.R. Pratap, appealed against a Madras High Court order that had dismissed their applicati...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Election Officer's Order Directing Inclusion of Nominees in Final Voters List for Satara District Central Co-operative Bank. Federal Society's Exclusion of Nominated Members from Provisional Voters List Held Without Jurisdiction Under Rule 10 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014.
1 Oct 2021These two writ petitions concerned a challenge to orders passed by the District Co-operative Society Election Officer dated 20 September 2021. The pet...
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes Pending Applications and Show Cause Notices in Scheme of Compromise Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956. Criminal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Allowed to Continue Notwithstanding Sanction of Scheme.
7 Jan 2010The matter arose from a scheme of compromise and arrangement proposed by Europlast India Ltd. under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The unsecu...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Work Order Containing Arbitration Clause Constitutes Valid Arbitration Agreement Between Contractor and Property Owner.
25 Jul 2019The petitioner, M/s. Shilpi Constructions Engineers & Contractors, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Share Transactions. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's findings on unauthorized trades and liability of broker are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Jul 2013The petitioner, Kotak Securities Limited, a registered stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 c...
- 111
