Search Results for "article 324"

846 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 846 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's representation not considered independently, violating Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(2) of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Smt. Marry Usha, wife of the detenu Gnana Prakash, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay, Non-Consideration of Bail Order, and Violation of Article 22(5). Detaining Authority Failed to Communicate Representation Decision and Consider Bail Order; Violated Petitioner's Constitutional Right.

The case pertained to a writ of habeas corpus filed by the detenu challenging a preventive detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangero...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes Three Criminal Applications in Matrimonial Dispute Seeking Quashing of FIRs. Accusations Involve IPC, POCSO Act, and Juvenile Justice Act Allegations Between Family Members.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with three interconnected proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute between a husband (Prakash Hotch...