Search Results for "arbitrator impartiality"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Venue Change in Arbitration Dispute — Clause 19.3(b) of Agreement Held to Specify Seat, Not Venue, Under Section 20 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Dhule Municipal Commissioner, challenged an interim order dated 16/06/2024 passed by the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Proceeding No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Enforcement of Foreign Award on Grounds of Arbitrator Bias — Upholds High Court Order. Alleged Conflict of Interest of Presiding Arbitrator Not Sufficient to Refuse Enforcement Under Section 48(2)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award. The dispute arose from a Share Subscription Agreement bet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Due to Arbitrator's Failure to Disclose Conflict of Interest. Arbitrator's prior role as counsel for a party in another case raised justifiable doubts about impartiality under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arises from a dispute between Vinod Bhaiyalal Jain and others (appellants) and Wadhwani Parmeshwari Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) regar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Death of Named Arbitrators in Arbitration Clause. Clause 21 of Agreement Construed as Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Applicant, Global Cements Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale with the Respondent, The Associated Cement Companies Ltd., on 16 December 1989....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...