Search Results for "Unauthorized occupant"

206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Under Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955 — Lease Expiry and Government Requirement Justify Eviction. Petitioner's challenge to eviction dismissed as lease had expired and premises were required for government purposes.

The petitioner, Laxmi B. Metkari, was a lessee of a commercial premises in Mumbai under a lease deed dated 13 June 1981, renewed until 28 September 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders of De-requisition and Possession Handover Under Bombay Land Requisition Act. State Held Obligated to Deliver Possession of De-requisitioned Premises to Landlord, Not Unauthorised Third Party, Under Sections 9(1) and 9(3) of the Act.

The writ petition arose from a dispute regarding Room No. 26, Chhotani Building, Lower Parel, Mumbai. The petitioner was the landlord of the building....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against LIC Eviction Order — Upholds Estate Officer's Jurisdiction Under Public Premises Act. Lease Determination and Non-Payment of Rent Justify Eviction of Tenants from LIC Premises.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed against a common judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing writ petitions chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice Against Tenants in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Notice Issued Without Hearing Tenants Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Section 264(1) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 Requires Notice to Occupants Before Demolition.

The petitioners, who are tenants of various shops in a building owned by the respondent no. 3 (since deceased), challenged a notice dated 05.03.2021 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Housing Board Dispute — Unauthorized Construction Not Ipso Facto Nuisance but Concurrent Findings Upheld. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Despite Section 71 Bar of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 as Suit Pertains to Private Rights.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant No.1, Sau. Smita Mohod, against concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court...