Search Results for "Tribunal Award Modified"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Tribunal Award Modified"

1877 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1877 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Commercial Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act — Petitioner Contends Award Ignores Contractual Back-to-Back Payment Clause. Award of Rs.25.27 Crore Granted by Arbitrator Based on Letter Dated 15 November 2019 is Alleged to be Perverse and Patently Illegal, Ignoring That Payments Were Contingent on Receipts from Rural Development Department.

5 Dec 2025

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Arbitral Award dated 11 July 2024. The Arbitral...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Development Dispute. Court Upholds Damages for Breach but Disallows Compound Interest.

5 Mar 2024

The judgment arises from two arbitration appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common order dated 25th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Share Transactions. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's findings on unauthorized trades and liability of broker are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Kotak Securities Limited, a registered stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 c...

High Court

High Court Considers Whether Arbitrator Has Jurisdiction to Pass Successive Awards and Whether Claims Are Barred by Res Judicata. Challenge to Awards Confirmed by Lower Court Raises Issues of Functus Officio and Splitting of Claims under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Sep 2024

The appeals arose from two arbitration awards passed by the sole arbitrator in disputes between Mysore Lamp Works Limited (appellant) and S.V. Enginee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Award declared firm dissolved on a date not claimed by any party and failed to consider crucial evidence regarding partnership property.

5 Jun 2017

The Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges an arbitral award dated 1st August 2006. The petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Admitted and Heard Commercial Arbitration Appeal Challenging Single Judge's Refusal to Enforce Three Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Section 50 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appeal Involves Enforcement Against Non-Signatory Related Companies and Alleged Asset Diversion Through Demerger Schemes to Defeat Execution of ICC London Awards Totaling Over USD 20 Million.

30 Dec 2025

The appeal originated from a dispute between Imax Corporation (appellant) and E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (first respondent) arising from a Mas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Claimant's Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Multiplier Applied as per Second Schedule of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

19 Mar 2013

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by K.B. Shivakumar Swamy (claimant) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seek...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Modifying Interest Award Due to Claimant's Delay and Unreasonable Rate. Arbitrator's Discretion Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Must Be Exercised with Reasons, and Interest Cannot Be Awarded for Periods of Inaction, with Rate Reduced from 18% to 9% and 6%.

30 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from a construction contract awarded in 1971 for building a road link, with completion delayed until 1977. The contractor, afte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award. Dispute Related to Charter Hire Agreement for Offshore Drilling, Involving Claims for Lost Equipment, Day Rates, and Demobilisation Fees.

20 Dec 2014

The Bombay High Court considered an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Lt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Awards in HPCL LPG Cylinder Supply Disputes — No Patent Illegality Found in Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Terms. The court upheld the Single Judge's dismissal of objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitrator's view was plausible and not patently illegal.

16 Mar 2019

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging orders passed by a Single J...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)