WRIT PETITION NO. 15903 OF 2024
6 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Telegraph Act"
112 result(s) found
Found 112 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Wireless Telegraphy Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 155(2) CrPC. FIR registered without prior permission of Magistrate for non-cognizable offence under Section 6 of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act read with Section 20 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, held invalid.
12 Dec 2022The petitioner, Anderson Mark Richard, a British national and former Senior Executive of Offshore Petroleum Industry Training Organization, filed a cr...
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.
2 Dec 2022The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat's Jurisdiction in Service Dispute. The Court held that the dispute concerning recovery of excess payment from pension and gratuity of a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran relates to a public utility service under Section 22A(b) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and the Permanent Lok Adalat has jurisdiction.
10 Aug 2022The Petitioner, the Chief Administrative Officer of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29 June 2019 pas...
- 26
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Power Grid Corporation's Writ Petitions Against Execution Proceedings for Land Acquisition Compensation — Held That Civil Court Has No Jurisdiction to Entertain Execution Petition for Enhanced Compensation Under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and the Electricity Act, 2003.
7 Mar 2018The petitioner, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, a Government of India enterprise, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Telecom Tower Installation in Residential Area Under Section 419 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Municipal Corporation Cannot Refuse Permission Based on Unauthorized Policy Restricting Towers in Residential Zones. Held that the power to grant permission under Section 419 is quasi-judicial and must be exercised reasonably, and a blanket ban on telecom towers in residential areas is ultra vires the Act.
26 Sep 2017The petitioner, Bharti Airtel Limited, a telecom service provider, sought permission from the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to install a teleco...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Joint Charity Commissioner's Direction to Amend Trust Constitution Under Section 41A of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 — Trustees Voluntarily Agree to Consider Amendment, Rendering Their Challenge Infructuous.
13 Oct 2006The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Amravati, under Section 41A of the Bombay Public Tru...
- 406
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Reconnection of Telephone Lines Disconnected Without Notice. Disconnection of Telephone Facilities Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 7B of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885.
1 Mar 2006The petitioner, Shri Ajay Madhukar Thakur, was a consumer of telephone services provided by the respondents, who were officials of Bharat Sanchar Niga...
- 130
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Consumer's Petition for Reconnection of Telephone Lines and CBI Investigation. Petitioner failed to establish any illegality in disconnection for non-payment of bills, and no grounds for CBI investigation were made out.
11 Oct 2005The petitioner, a consumer of the telephone department, filed a writ petition seeking reconnection of six telephone lines (nos. 549577, 544729, 555801...
- 116
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Railway Promotion Policy, Holds That Equal Opportunity in Employment Applies Only Within Same Class. Promotion of Guards to Higher Grade Station Master Posts Does Not Violate Article 16(1) as Guards and Roadside Station Masters Constitute Distinct and Separate Classes.
20 Nov 1959This is a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India filed by the All India Station Masters’ and Assistant Station Masters’ Assoc...
