Bombay High Court Upholds Joint Charity Commissioner's Direction to Amend Trust Constitution Under Section 41A of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 — Trustees Voluntarily Agree to Consider Amendment, Rendering Their Challenge Infructuous.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 497
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Amravati, under Section 41A of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The applicants (petitioners in WP 2967/2005) sought directions regarding membership admission and amendment of the trust constitution of Vidarbha Youth Welfare Society, Amravati, a public trust running multiple educational institutions. The Joint Charity Commissioner partly allowed the application, directing the trustees to amend the constitution but rejecting other prayers. The trustees filed WP 4342/2005 challenging the direction to amend. During hearing, the trustees' counsel stated they were independently considering the amendment and would not press their petition if the applicants' petition was dismissed. The High Court noted the pending revision and other applications, and disposed of both petitions with the trustees' statement, effectively upholding the Commissioner's order.

Headnote

A) Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Section 41A - Powers of Charity Commissioner - Amendment of Trust Scheme - The Joint Charity Commissioner partly allowed the application under Section 41A directing the trustees to amend the constitution of the trust, but rejected prayers for direction not to admit members without proper procedure and not to put new life membership on agenda without Executive Committee consensus. The High Court upheld the order, noting that the trustees were independently considering the amendment. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Joint Charity Commissioner under Section 41A of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 could direct amendment of the trust constitution and whether the applicants' other prayers regarding membership admission and agenda setting were rightly rejected.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions disposed of. Writ Petition No. 2967/2005 dismissed; Writ Petition No. 4342/2005 disposed of as not pressed in view of the trustees' statement that they are independently considering the amendment of the scheme on the lines observed by the Joint Charity Commissioner.

Law Points

  • Section 41A of Bombay Public Trust Act
  • 1950
  • powers of Charity Commissioner
  • amendment of trust scheme
  • membership categories in public trust
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (10) 97

Writ Petition Nos. 2967 and 4342 of 2005

2006-10-13

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.

Mr. K.H. Deshpande, Senior Advocate, with Mr. R.K. Deshpande and Mr. N.W. Sambre for Petitioners (in WP 2967/2005); Mr. R. Deo and Mr. R.D. Bhuibar for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 (in WP 2967/2005) and for Petitioner (in WP 4342/2005); Learned AGP for Respondent No. 3 (in WP 2967/2005) and Respondent No. 5 (in WP 4342/2005)

Vijay Pundlikrao Gohod and others (in WP 2967/2005); Vidarbha Youth Welfare Society, Amravati (in WP 4342/2005)

Vidarbha Youth Welfare Society, Amravati and others (in WP 2967/2005); Shri Vinay Pundlikrao Gohod and others (in WP 4342/2005)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the order of Joint Charity Commissioner under Section 41A of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 regarding amendment of trust constitution and membership issues.

Remedy Sought

Applicants sought complete relief by modifying the Joint Charity Commissioner's order; trustees sought to quash the direction to amend the constitution.

Filing Reason

The Joint Charity Commissioner partly allowed the application under Section 41A, directing amendment of the trust constitution but rejecting other prayers; both parties were aggrieved.

Previous Decisions

Joint Charity Commissioner's order dated 10.06.2005 under Section 41A of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.

Issues

Whether the Joint Charity Commissioner under Section 41A of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 could direct amendment of the trust constitution? Whether the rejection of prayers regarding membership admission and agenda setting was correct?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that the Joint Charity Commissioner should have allowed all their prayers, including directions on membership admission and agenda. Trustees initially challenged the direction to amend the constitution but later stated they were independently considering the amendment and would not press their petition if the applicants' petition was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi

The Joint Charity Commissioner under Section 41A of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 has the power to direct amendment of the trust constitution. The trustees' voluntary agreement to consider the amendment rendered their challenge infructuous.

Judgment Excerpts

The Trustees who are respondents in this Writ Petition, have also questioned the said order by filing Writ Petition No.4342/2005 to the extent of directing them to amend the constitution/ scheme. During hearing Advocate Deo, who appears for the Trustees made clear that the Trustees are independently considering the issue of effecting amendment to the scheme on the lines as observed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, and, if Writ Petition No. 2967/2005, is dismissed, the trustees will not be interested in pressing Writ Petition No. 4342/2005.

Procedural History

The applicants filed an application under Section 41A of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 before the Joint Charity Commissioner, Amravati, which was partly allowed on 10.06.2005. Both parties filed writ petitions in the High Court challenging the order. The trustees later stated they would not press their petition if the applicants' petition was dismissed.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950: Section 41A, Section 41D
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Prohibitory Relief Against Construction Interference — Negative Relief Not Maintainable Under Article 226. Execution of Civil Decree Cannot Be Sought Through Writ Proceedings; Petitioner Deceased, L...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Property Tax Reassessment for Failure to Exhaust Statutory Remedy. Petitioner CEAT Ltd. challenged reassessment under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 without first avail...