Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

1083 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1083 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Service of Notice. Service of Notice on Son Not Valid Service Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Smt. Sampada Vilas Mahargude, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talewadi, Taluka Atpadi, District Sangli. A motion of no confidence w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Remand Order in Right of Way Dispute Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Court upholds Additional Collector's order remitting matter for fresh enquiry as Tahsildar's order was passed without proper notice and opportunity of hearing.

The petitioners, Nago Hari Zangte and others, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Additional Collector and Additional Commissioner whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rameshwar Gaikwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for the murder of his wife Shobha by burning, under Sect...