Search Results for "Store Keeper"

39 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Closure Compensation Award in Industrial Dispute. Court Holds That Discontinuance of Operations Amounts to Closure Under Section 25-FFF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Siemens Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing bogie frames for Indian Railways, employed 99 workmen. On 14.08.2014, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Complainant in Cheque Dishonour Cases, Convicts Accused. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused who stopped payment without valid cause, and dispute with third party not a defence.

The case involves three parties: Hewlett Packard (HP), Kores (India) Ltd. (complainant/appellant), and M/s Ambitious Marketing (accused/respondent). K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement and Passing Off Claims Over Web Series Title 'Singardaan' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiff's Short Story and Defendants' Web Series.

The Plaintiff, Shamoil Ahmad Khan, a writer of Urdu and Hindi short stories, filed a copyright infringement suit alleging that the Defendants' web ser...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revision Order Setting Aside Promotions in Municipal Council. Promotions to Senior Clerk Post Quashed for Non-Compliance with Recruitment Rules and Established Norms.

The petitioner, an employee of Barshi Municipal Council, challenged an order dated 6th November 1999 passed by the Additional Commissioner and Regiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Promotion to Sanitary Supervisor Post in Defence Establishment. Petitioner entitled to promotion from date of vacancy with consequential benefits as post existed and was not abolished.

The petitioner, M. Venugopalan, was employed as a Sanitary Inspector under the Ministry of Defence and was promoted to that post on 25.5.1978. He clai...