Search Results for "Shareholder"

363 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 363 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Deemed Dividend Case — Advances from Sister Concern for Software Development Held Not Deemed Dividend Under Section 2(22)(e) of Income-Tax Act, 1961. Business Transactions in Ordinary Course Excluded from Deemed Dividend Provisions.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave for Representative Suit in Tata Group Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that shareholders of different listed companies lack the same interest required under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC.

The Plaintiffs, claiming to be shareholders of various listed companies of the Tata Group, filed a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Deemed Dividend Case Under Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure by Company on Lessor's Property Not Deemed Dividend as It Was for Business Purpose and Not for Shareholder's Benefit.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 9th September 2011. The resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Foreign Company Failed to Comply with Registration Requirements Under Sections 592 and 599 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner, a foreign company with a place of business in India, cannot maintain a winding-up petition without registering under the Act.

The petitioner, Willis Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its principal place of business in the United Kingdo...