Search Results for "Section 452 Companies Act"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Contemnors Guilty for Breach of Undertakings in Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award. Repeated assurances to court regarding protection of assets were violated by transferring shares, constituting civil contempt under Article 129 of the Constitution.

The case arises from a dispute between Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited (the petitioner) and the respondents in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.20417 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Injunction Application in Copyright Infringement Suit Concerning Digital Music Platform’s Use of Sound Recordings. The Court Examines Defenses of Fair Use and Statutory License Under Sections 52 and 31-D of the Copyright Act, 1957.

The present proceeding arose from two commercial IP suits filed by Tips Industries Ltd. (plaintiff) against Wynk Music Ltd. and another (defendants) b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Finds Reliance Companies Guilty of Contempt for Breach of Undertakings to Pay INR 550 Crore to Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. The court held that the undertakings making payment conditional upon sale of assets were contrary to the court's order and constituted wilful disobedience.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with three contempt petitions filed by Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. against Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Teleco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Company Appeal as Court Lacks Power to Extend Limitation Beyond 60 Days Under Section 421 of Companies Act, 2013. Delay of 135 Days in Filing Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Cannot Be Condoned as Statutory Limitation Is Absolute.

The applicant, Santosh Kumar Hegde, filed a company application seeking condonation of delay of 135 days in lodging a company appeal against an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.

The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...