Search Results for "Section 42(9)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Section 42(9)"

404 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 404 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order in Bootlegger Case for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Preventive detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs under Prohibition Act does not establish threat to public order.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Ajaybhai Jentibhai Chudasma, through his brother Chudasma Rakesh Jentibhai, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 an...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order of Bootlegger Under PASA Act for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Preventive detention set aside as the detaining authority failed to demonstrate that the alleged activities of the detenue affected public order rather than mere law and order.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Ajaybhai Jentibhai Chudasma, through his brother Chudasma Rakesh Jentibhai, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Redetermination Under Section 28-A Permissible Based on High Court Judgment in Same Acquisition. The Court held that Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is a beneficent provision and an application for redetermination can be filed within three months from the date of the appellate court's judgment if it is the first determination in the acquisition.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Banwari and others against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had set aside the or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cattle Poisoning Case Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Accused to Offence. Prosecution failed to prove that accused sprayed pesticide on grass consumed by bullocks, as no witness saw the act and chemical analysis did not connect the seized bottles to the poisoning.

21 Feb 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Bhanudas Nivrutti Lande by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khed, for offences under Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

17 Dec 2014

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

High Court

KAHC010422252008_1

17 Dec 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

17 Dec 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Blast Hole Drilling Dispute, Upholds Rate of Rs.115 per Meter for Work Done Without Formal Contract. Court Holds That Absence of Formal Agreement Does Not Preclude Payment on Quantum Meruit Basis for Work Actually Performed and Accepted.

7 Oct 2014

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a suit for recovery of Rs.22,76,673/- filed by M/s. Shri Sowmiya Enterprises (plaintiff/contractor) a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Theft Resistance Incident. The court found that the appellant had knowledge that his act of assaulting two persons with iron scissors and fists/kicks was likely to cause death, but no intention to cause death, under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2 Mar 2012

The appellant, Josh S/o C Mathew, was prosecuted for offences under Sections 302, 307, 323, and 429 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for an incident on ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

1 Jan 1970

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)