Search Results for "Section 354B IPC"

60 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as order passed mechanically without application of mind.

The petitioner, Arshit @ Lembo Najabhai Sankhat, through his father Najabhai Karshanbhai Sankhat, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 quashed as mere registration of FIRs does not constitute a threat to public order.

The petitioner, Suraj @Indo Rajubhai Sakarabhai Raval, was preventively detained by an order dated 23.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detenu's Alleged Criminal Activities Did Not Affect Public Order Under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Jaydeep @Deepi Bhoopati Dwivedi, through his father Bhoopatiprashd H Dwivedi, challenged a preventive detention order dated 17.11.2025...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order.

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai @ Pilot Hamirbhai Chauhan, was preventively detained by an order dated 24.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Mohammad Hanif Mohammad Husain Chotumiya Shaikh, was preventively detained by an order dated 30.12.2025 passed by the Commissioner of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Ramjan @ Ramu S/o Shaheb @ Shaban Shah, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, under Section 2(c) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of threat to public order.

The petitioner, Divyanshu @ Devo Bijendrasingh Mansingh Chauhan, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, vide order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Sumit @ Bali Vikrambhai Chunara, through his uncle Anil Dipakbhai Chunara, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Removal of Petitioner's Name from Digital Records in Quashed Criminal Case — Right to be Forgotten Upheld. Petitioner's Right to Privacy under Article 21 Prevails Over Public Access to Quashed Proceedings.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Registrar General of the High ...