Search Results for "Section 354-A"

266 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 266 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Travel Permission for Accused in POCSO Case — Accused Allowed to Travel to US for Ten Months with Cash Security. Special Court's Order Relaxing Bail Conditions Upheld as No Perversity Found; Accused Must Return by 30.06.2020 and Attend Police Station Upon Return.

The petitioner, Maria Kuttubudin Lokhandwala, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 22.08.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR — Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Guruprasad Daulat Bhalavi, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case 224/2016 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Maternal Uncle in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. The court held that vague allegations without specific overt acts do not constitute an offence under Sections 354A, 504, 506 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act.

The petitioner, Ayyub Babu Shaikh, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction Under Section 354 IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Testimony of Child Witness and Uncle Found Unreliable.

The appellant, Akhil Ismail Pinjari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5 and 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, under Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Child Witnesses and Lack of Evidence of Sexual Assault. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetration Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bandu s/o Natthuji Raut, was convicted by the Special Judge, Yavatmal, for offences under Sections 451, 376(2)(i)(j)(1) of the Indian P...