Search Results for "Section 185 Motor Vehicles Act"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. The Court apportioned liability 50:50 between the car driver and the truck driver, reducing the insurer's liability from full award to 50%.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of a deceased pillion rider. The deceased was riding pillion on a motor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused drove in a rash or negligent manner causing death.

The appellant, Sagar Lolienkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Addition of Charges at Final Stage in Summary Trial - Prejudice to Accused. Addition of charges under Bombay Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicles Act after evidence closed held to cause prejudice in summary trial.

The petitioner, a police driver, was prosecuted for an incident on 1-1-1987 under Sections 279, 337, 427 IPC and Section 117 of the Motor Vehicles Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Six First Appeals on Common Issue of Multiplier in Motor Accident Cases. Multiplier to be Based on Age of Deceased and Not on Age of Claimants, and 50% Deduction for Personal Expenses of Bachelor Deceased Upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The Bombay High Court was seized of six first appeals arising from awards of various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals, all involving the death of young...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Challenge to Sections 17(2) and 32(1) Proviso of MMRDA Act by Consent. Land Acquisition by MMRDA Under Challenge: Petitioners Allege Unconstitutional Provisions in MMRDA Act, 1974.

The Bombay High Court heard and disposed of a group of matters comprising Writ Petition No. 841 of 2012, Public Interest Litigation No. 3 of 2011, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge Under Section 304 IPC. The court held that the blood alcohol level was within permissible limits under Section 185 MV Act and that custodial interrogation was not required.

The applicant, a female MBA graduate and businesswoman, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with a fatal hit-and-run acciden...