Search Results for "Section 17"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Auction Sale — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Held Efficacious. No Interference Under Article 226 in Absence of Fraud or Collusion.

The petitioner, Buniya Devi Chauhan, through her power of attorney holder Dharmendra Shambhunath Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in SARFAESI Matter Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Petitioner Had Already Filed Applications Under Section 17 Before DRT, Rendering Writ Petition Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Chandrashekar H.S., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit Challenging SARFAESI Action — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit Alleging Violation of RBI Guidelines and Fraud.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Bank of Baroda (applicant/original defendant) challenging an order dated 26/04/2018 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in POCSO Abetment Case — No Evidence of Intentional Aiding. Section 17 POCSO Act requires mens rea and overt act; mere presence or failure to protect insufficient for conviction.

The appellant, Asha Patil, was convicted under Section 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for abetting the se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Appeal as Not Maintainable Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Application for Direction to Opt for One Remedy Not an Appealable Order Under Section 17 or Section 16 of the Act.

The appellants, M/s. Areeb Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Charter Hire Dispute. Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Provide for Appeal Against Interim Orders Under Section 17 of the Act.

The case involves an appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declares Plaintiff Owner of Copyright in Drawings Developed Under Contract for Valuable Consideration. Payment of Rs.2,87,500/- for Development of Drug Powder Inhaler Transfers Copyright Ownership Under Section 17 of Copyright Act, 1957.

The plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, a pharmaceutical company, sought to develop a Drug Powder Inhaler (DPI) device for asthma medications...