SECOND APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2008
21 Mar 2017...
Search Results for "Section 162"
1438 result(s) found
Found 1438 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...
- 93
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.
10 May 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...
- 324
High Court
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Considered Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Land Acquisition Amendment for Bullet Train Project. Petition Raised Questions of Repugnancy Under Article 254, Presidential Assent, Natural Justice, and Scope of Section 33 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013.
9 Feb 2023The litigation concerned a challenge to land acquisition for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail project, commonly called the Bullet Train Project. T...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.
10 Jun 2010This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.
14 Jun 2011The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...
- 51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.
1 Jan 1970This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...
- 95
High Court
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Deliberates on Tax Exemption and Classification of Lease Transactions in Income Tax Reference concerning Scientific Research Centre. Assessee's claim for exemption under Section 11 of Income Tax Act, 1961 hinges on whether activities constitute general public utility, whether construction and letting out of World Trade Centre amounts to business, and whether receipts are revenue in nature.
25 Oct 2012The Income Tax Reference No. 78 of 1998 arose from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's common order dated 29th March, 1996, for assessment years 1989-...
- 80
