Search Results for "Section 13(B)"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against Conversion of Divorce Petition to Mutual Consent Divorce Without Proper Consent. Family Court's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-wife, Mrs. Bharti Bhausaheb Aher, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 20.6.2015 passed by the Principal Judge, Family C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Interim Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Prima Facie Finds Interim Award Passed Without Considering Entire Pleadings and Grants Stay of Enforcement.

The matter involved two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Set Aside Consent Divorce Decree in Matrimonial Dispute — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent terms recorded by Family Court under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 are binding and cannot be unilaterally rescinded.

The judgment arises from two miscellaneous civil applications filed by Vijay Suryakant Kakade and Jay Suryakant Kakade (applicants) seeking to set asi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Reject Plaint in Suit for Conveyance and Amenities. Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Claim for Conveyance is Continuing Cause of Action Not Barred by Limitation.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicants (defendants in the suit) challenging the order of the learned Senior Civil Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reduction in Pay Scale as Punishment for Misconduct in Tata Memorial Hospital. Disciplinary action based on established misconduct and apology considered by employer.

The First Petitioner, Dr. Ganesh T. Panse, was employed as a Scientific Officer with the First Respondent, Tata Memorial Hospital. On 22nd September 2...