Search Results for "Section 113-A"

192 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 192 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Section 498A Jurisdiction Case — Courts at Wife's Parental Home Have Jurisdiction Even Without Overt Acts of Cruelty There. Continuing Offence and Consequence-Based Jurisdiction Under CrPC Sections 178 and 179 Apply to Section 498A IPC.

The case involves a group of appeals before the Supreme Court of India concerning the jurisdictional issue under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Surrendered DP Road Land Despite No-Objection Condition. Transferable Development Rights cannot be denied merely because surrender was a condition of permission; entitlement arises from statutory scheme under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Nirmal Ujwal Credit Cooperative Society, challenged a communication dated 22.09.2014 from the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (Planning A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Non-Payment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Acquisition Lapses as Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years Despite Possession Taken.

The petitioners, original owners of land at Roadpali, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their land by CIDCO under the Land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Petition to Acquire Land by Offering FSI/TDR Without Owner's Consent. Corporation Cannot Unilaterally Substitute Monetary Compensation with Development Rights Under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioner, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, a municipal corporation established under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Ac...