Search Results for "Search Procedures"

113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Arrest Order in BNSS and IT Act Case. Arrest Upheld as Police Complied with Mandatory Notice Under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and Procedural Safeguards, Despite Petitioner's Evasion and Refusal to Cooperate.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed by the petitioner, who was accused No.1 in Crime No.271 of 2025, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Homicide Alleged Under Sections 302, 201, 120B IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of Kiran Suryawanshi, who was married to accused No. 1 Monika. The prosecution alleged that Monika, along with accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Reforming Sentencing Practices in Indian Criminal Justice: Towards Fairness and Consistency Navigating Legal Precedents and Recommendations for Systematic Change

Compiles excerpts from various legal sources and cases concerning sentencing guidelines and procedures in the Indian criminal justice system. It discu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...