Search Results for "Sealing notice"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging BBMP Tax Demand and Sealing Without Proper Procedure Under BBMP Act, 2020. Demand notice quashed and premises directed to be de-sealed as BBMP failed to follow statutory procedure under the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020.

The petitioner, Shariff Constructions, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Non-Compliance with Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Division and Sealing of Samples Leads to Upholding of Acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused for offences under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sealing Order Under Section 18 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 — Petitioner Failed to Show Prejudice from Procedural Irregularities. Typographical Error in Designation of Authority Does Not Vitiate Order When Power Was Validly Conferred.

The petitioner, Smt. Sharada Premlal Chhadi, aged 65 years, was the occupier of House No.6, City Survey No.175/528, Nagpur. She was allegedly running ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Petition by Airports Authority Against Licensee in Public Premises Act Case. Licence Expired by Efflux of Time, Occupant Becomes Unauthorised Under Section 2(g) of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Airports Authority of India, a body corporate constituted under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenged an order dated 8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Property Dispute Due to Limitation. Delay of Over 3 Years in Challenging Ex-Parte Decree Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Held Not Sufficiently Explained.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the Plaintiff/Applicant, Smt. Gopi, widow of Tarachand R. Advani, seeking to set aside an ex-parte order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Contempt Notice Against Rajeev Dixit in Official Liquidator Lock Breaking Case. Breaking open lock and seal of Official Liquidator does not constitute contempt under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 as no specific court order prohibited such act.

The present show cause notice was issued against Rajeev M Dixit for breaking open the lock and seal of the Official Liquidator which was placed on the...