High Court of Gujarat Disposes of Petitions in Property Sealing Case with Directions for Fresh Applications. Court Ordered Petitioners to Submit Change of Use Applications Within Seven Days and Respondents to Decide Within Two Weeks, Allowing Retrieval of Belongings from Sealed Premises Under Gujarat Housing Board Regulations.

High Court: Gujarat High Court Bench: AHEMDABAD
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute involved multiple petitions filed by property owners challenging notices dated 23.12.2025 issued by the Gujarat Housing Board, which resulted in the sealing of their premises on the ground of unauthorized change of use from residential to commercial. The petitioners, who were not original allottees but had acquired the properties through registered conveyance deeds, argued that they had applied for change of use permissions and that these applications were pending, making the sealing action illegal. The respondents countered that prior notices had been issued in March and July 2025, the original allotment prohibited change of use, the petitioners had engaged in commercial activities and encroached on public roads, and the land ownership remained with the Gujarat Housing Board. The court considered the submissions, noting the grievance over the sealing and the dispute regarding the pendency of applications. It observed that no permission for change of use had been granted. The court disposed of the petitions by directing the petitioners to make fresh individual applications to the Gujarat Housing Board within seven days for change of use permission, allowing them to pursue existing applications or submit new ones. The respondents were instructed to decide these applications expeditiously within two weeks and to provide the petitioners with a fixed date and time to retrieve their belongings from the sealed premises. The rule was discharged, and direct service was permitted.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Change of Use Permission - Sealing of Premises - Gujarat Housing Board Regulations - Petitioners challenged sealing notices issued for using residential premises for commercial activities without permission - Court noted applications for change of use were pending but no permission had been granted - Held that petitioners must make fresh applications within seven days and respondents must decide within two weeks, with provision for petitioners to retrieve belongings from sealed premises (Paras 6-8).

Issue of Consideration: Whether the sealing of premises under Notice dated 23.12.2025 was justified when applications for change of use from residential to commercial were pending before the Gujarat Housing Board

Final Decision

Petitions disposed of with directions: (i) Petitioners to make fresh individual applications to Gujarat Housing Board for change of use permission within seven days; (ii) Petitioners may pursue existing applications or make fresh ones; (iii) Respondents to decide applications within two weeks; (iv) Respondents to decide in accordance with law; (v) Respondents to provide fixed date and time for petitioners to retrieve belongings from sealed premises. Rule discharged, direct service permitted.

2026 LawText (GUJ) (01) 530

R/Special Civil Application No. 211 of 2026, R/Special Civil Application No. 213 of 2026, R/Special Civil Application No. 214 of 2026, R/Special Civil Application No. 215 of 2026, R/Special Civil Application No. 216 of 2026

2026-01-09

Honourable Mrs. Justice Mauna M. Bhatt

2026:GUJHC:1502

Mr AJ Yagnik with Mr Aishwary B. Gupta for the Petitioner(s), Mr G H Virk, Ld. Government Pleader with Mr SH Virk, Mr Jagrat Shah, Ms Nency Sheth, Ms Riya Navin, Ld.Advocates for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3, Mr Sahil Trivedi, Ld.Asstt. Government Pleader for the Respondent(s) No. 1

Harshit Navnitlal Shah & Anr.

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Nature of Litigation: Petitions challenging sealing notices issued by Gujarat Housing Board for unauthorized change of use from residential to commercial

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing and setting aside of Notice dated 23.12.2025 and sealing of premises

Filing Reason

Premises were sealed on ground of use other than residential despite pending applications for change of use permission

Previous Decisions

Notices issued in March 2025 and July 2025 informing about illegal use other than residential

Issues

Legality of sealing premises under Notice dated 23.12.2025 when applications for change of use were pending

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued they are owners via registered conveyance deeds, have applied for change of use, and sealing is illegal due to pending applications Respondents argued prior notices were given, original allotment prohibits change of use, petitioners engaged in commercial activities and encroachment, and land ownership remains with Gujarat Housing Board

Ratio Decidendi

When applications for change of use permission are pending but no permission has been granted, sealing action may be addressed by directing fresh applications and expedited decision, with provision for retrieval of belongings, rather than quashing the notices outright.

Judgment Excerpts

These petitions are filed challenging Notices dated 23.12.2025, under which, the petitioners’ premises have been sealed on the ground of their use other than residential. It is case of the petitioners that despite pendency of applications seeking change in use permission, the petitioners have started using their premises with commercial activities. Seven days’ time is given to the petitioners from today to make fresh individual applications to the Gujarat Housing Board seeking change in use permission.

Procedural History

Petitions filed challenging Notices dated 23.12.2025; Rule issued and made returnable forthwith; waivers of service of Rule by respondents; hearing conducted; petitions disposed of with directions.

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Disposes of Petitions in Property Sealing Case with Directions for Fresh Applications. Court Ordered Petitioners to Submit Change of Use Applications Within Seven Days and Respondents to Decide Within Two Weeks, Allowing Retriev...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Forest Land Injunction Suit Due to Illegal Transfer and Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Transfer of Settlement Land Without Prior Sanction Under Indian Forest Act, 1927, is Void, and Possession Under Such Ag...