Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1563 of 2023
3 Jul 2025The appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 arises from the order of the NCLT, Allahabad Bench dated 06.10.2023 dismissing...
Search Results for "Saraswat Bank"
80 result(s) found
Found 80 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case — Lack of Mens Rea and Knowledge of Counterfeit Notes. Petitioner deposited demonetized currency notes in bank; five notes found counterfeit but no evidence she knew they were fake, essential for Section 489B IPC.
1 Oct 2018The petitioner, Sanskriti Jayantilal Salia, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code ...
- 64
High Court
APPEAL NO. 313 OF 2015
1 Dec 2016These appeals arose from a common judgment and order dated 31st March 2015 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in two proceedings: Suit ...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Full and True Disclosure Finding and Non-Disposal of Objections. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Alleged Under Section 147 First Proviso of Income Tax Act, 1961.
27 Feb 2025The petitioner, Crystal Pride Developers, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed its original return of income for Assessment Ye...
- 577
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Injunction Against Sale of Property in Arbitration Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief as Disputed Claims Require Full Trial. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience for interim injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the claims for unpaid bills and extra work were disputed and the property was not specifically linked to the contract.
21 Aug 2015The petitioner, Acron Developers Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim reli...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Application for Possession from Official Liquidator in Bank Winding-Up — No Alternative Premises Provided Despite Earlier Direction. Section 457 of Companies Act, 1956 does not empower court to order eviction of liquidator without suitable alternative accommodation being made available.
15 Apr 2026The Applicant, Shree Vishnu Holdings & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., is the owner and landlord of premises situated at Jayshree Chambers, 82 Nagindas Master ...
- 147
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Suit for Recovery Based on Dishonoured Cheque Due to Material Alteration. Cheque with discrepancy between figures and words held to be materially altered under Section 87 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, rendering it void against the drawer.
23 Jun 2023The plaintiff, Suneel Dattatraya Mogre, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against the defendant, Prabhakar Baburao Thorat, seeking a decree for Rs.2,25,...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Testamentary Suit, Upholds Execution Despite Handwritten Additions and Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Discharged Burden of Proof Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 by Examining Attesting Witness and Explaining Circumstances.
9 Jun 2016The plaintiffs, Kirit N. Damania and Shantaram V. Pikale, executors named in the Will of Shashikala Baburao Alandkar, sought probate of the Will dated...
- 381
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal in Money Suit. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application for Rejection of Plaint Dismissed as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.
2 Jun 2020The case involves three civil revision applications filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging a common order date...
- 27
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Transfer of FIRs in Cheating Case — No Territorial Jurisdiction to Transfer FIRs from Maharashtra to Karnataka. The court held that since the FIRs were registered in Pune, Maharashtra, and no part of the cause of action arose in Karnataka, the High Court of Karnataka lacked territorial jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
19 Dec 2013The petitioner, Deepak Kumar P. Shenvi, proprietor of M/s. Meghadoot Exim International, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Co...
- 39
