Search Results for "Sanction for prosecution"

314 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 314 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Police Officer in Private Complaint for Assault — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Renders Prosecution Invalid. Proceedings under Sections 326, 504, 506(II) and 34 IPC quashed as mandatory sanction for public servant not obtained.

The applicant, Manoj Prabhakar Lohar, an Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police in the State Intelligence Department, Mumbai, filed an application u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Scientist in Recruitment Scam Case — Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Criminal Conspiracy or Corruption. Allegations of Irregular Recruitment Without Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Cannot Sustain Prosecution.

The petitioner, Dr. Dhananjai Kumar Pandey, a Scientist at the National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research (NCAOR), Goa, filed a Criminal Writ Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that mandatory sanction for prosecution of public servants was not obtained, rendering the entire proceedings unsustainable.

The applicants, Ravindra Babulal Jain and Ashish Tejmal Mugdiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Dropping of Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction. Trial Court's Order Dropping Prosecution Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld as Sanction Under Section 19 is Mandatory.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 07.12.1999 passed by the Special Judge, Pune, in Special A/C Case No. 6 of 1991...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act for Lack of Sanction and Non-Cognizable Offences. Offences under Section 146(g)(k)(n)(p) of the Act are non-cognizable and require prior sanction under Section 148(3) for prosecution.

The applicant, Manoranjan Ramdas Rathod, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FI...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses CBI Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution in Corruption Case. Sanction order held valid despite not mentioning specific sections of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as material placed before authority indicated offences.

The petitioner, the Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation (ACB), Pune, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Con...