Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Servant in Election Forgery Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Allegations of impersonation and forgery during cooperative society election cannot proceed against public servant without prior sanction as required under Section 197 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 231
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Deelip s/o Manmathappa Gaunder, was a government servant working as Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies at Sailu. He was arrayed as an accused in Crime No.I-23/2015 registered at Police Station Charthana, District Parbhani. The case arose from an election of the Nirwadi (Kh.) V.K.S.S. Society scheduled for 22.3.2015. The complainant, Mahadev s/o Munjaji Lipane, was a contesting candidate. On 26.3.2015, the complainant filed a complaint before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sailu (Criminal Misc. Application No.58/2015) alleging that on the date of voting, a person named Kale Rambhau Tukaram came to the polling station with a forged identity card in the name of Kiralkar Rambhau Tukar (who had died on 11.12.2004) and claimed to be that person. The complainant alleged that the applicant, as the Returning Officer, allowed this impersonation and forgery. The FIR was registered for offences under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 109 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The applicant filed this criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the FIR on the ground that no prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC was obtained, as he was a public servant acting in discharge of official duty. The court considered the submissions of the applicant's counsel, the APP for the State, and the respondent's counsel. The court held that the acts alleged against the applicant were in discharge of his official duty as Returning Officer for the election. Therefore, prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC was mandatory before taking cognizance. Since no such sanction was obtained, the FIR and all proceedings were quashed. The court allowed the application and set aside the FIR.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Sanction for Prosecution - Section 197 CrPC - Public Servant - Acts in Discharge of Official Duty - The applicant, a government servant working as Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies, was accused of facilitating impersonation and forgery during an election. The court held that the acts alleged were in discharge of official duty as the election process was part of his official functions. Therefore, prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory before taking cognizance. In absence of sanction, the FIR and proceedings are quashed. (Paras 1-5)

B) Indian Penal Code - Forgery and Cheating - Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 109 IPC - Allegations of impersonation and forgery during cooperative society election - The court noted that the allegations against the applicant were that he allowed a person to vote using a forged identity card. However, since the act was part of his duty as Returning Officer, sanction under Section 197 CrPC is required. (Paras 2-5)

C) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(v) - Allegation of insult or intimidation - The complaint also invoked Section 3(1)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The court did not specifically address this provision but quashed the entire FIR due to lack of sanction. (Para 2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the prosecution of a public servant for alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 109 of IPC and Section 3(1)(v) of SC/ST Act can proceed without prior sanction under Section 197 of CrPC when the acts alleged were done in discharge of official duty.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the criminal application and quashed FIR No.I-23/2015 registered with Police Station Charthana, District Parbhani, and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Law Points

  • Sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory for prosecution of public servant for acts done in discharge of official duty
  • FIR quashed for lack of sanction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (07) 40

Criminal Application No.2219 of 2015

2015-07-17

S.S. Shinde, A.I.S. Cheema

M.P. Kale for applicant, B.L. Dhas (APP) for respondent No.1/State, S.G. Kawade for respondent No.2

Deelip s/o Manmathappa Gaunder

The State of Maharashtra, Mahadev s/o Munjaji Lipane

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR registered for offences under IPC and SC/ST Act.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.I-23/2015 and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Filing Reason

The applicant, a government servant, was accused of allowing impersonation and forgery during a cooperative society election. He sought quashing on the ground that no sanction under Section 197 CrPC was obtained.

Issues

Whether the acts alleged against the applicant were in discharge of his official duty as a public servant. Whether prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory before taking cognizance of offences against a public servant for acts done in discharge of official duty.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel argued that the applicant was a public servant acting in discharge of official duty as Returning Officer for the election, and therefore sanction under Section 197 CrPC was mandatory before prosecution. Respondent No.2's counsel opposed the application, but the court found that the acts were in discharge of official duty.

Ratio Decidendi

The acts alleged against the applicant were in discharge of his official duty as Returning Officer for the cooperative society election. Therefore, prior sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is mandatory before taking cognizance. In absence of such sanction, the FIR and proceedings are liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The applicant herein is arrayed as accused in Crime No.I-23/2015, registered with respondent No.1. The applicant is Government servant and working on the post of Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Sailu. It is the case of the applicant that the process of election of Nirwadi (Kh.), V.K.S.S. Society was set in motion and voting was scheduled to be held on 22.3.2015. The respondent No.2 filed complaint on 26.3.2015 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sailu bearing Criminal Misc. Application No.58/2015. The court held that the acts alleged were in discharge of official duty and sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No.2219 of 2015 under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking quashing of FIR No.I-23/2015 registered at Police Station Charthana, District Parbhani. The application was heard on 17th July 2015 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 197, 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 109
  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: 3(1)(v)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State Notification Withdrawing Sales Tax Exemption on Fresh Fruits Under Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. Notification Issued Before Commencement of Act Was Valid Because Published and Made Effective on April 1, 1959, the...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Referee Bench's Jurisdiction in Consumer Protection Act Reference. Referee Bench Cannot Decide Appeal Itself and Must Answer Referred Questions Before Returning Matter to Referring Bench Under Section 58(3), Consumer Protectio...