Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act for Lack of Sanction and Non-Cognizable Offences. Offences under Section 146(g)(k)(n)(p) of the Act are non-cognizable and require prior sanction under Section 148(3) for prosecution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 72
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Manoranjan Ramdas Rathod, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 3118 of 2010 registered with Police Station Pusad (City) under Section 147 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The FIR alleged offences under Section 146(g), (k), (n), and (p) of the Act. The applicant raised two primary grounds: first, that no sanction under Section 148(3) of the Act was obtained prior to prosecution, and second, that the offences alleged were non-cognizable, rendering the police investigation without jurisdiction. The court examined the provisions and found that the offences under Section 146(g), (k), (n), and (p) are punishable with imprisonment ranging from fine only to a maximum of three years. Since none of the offences carry a punishment exceeding three years, they are non-cognizable as per Schedule I of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Consequently, the police could not register an FIR or investigate without a magistrate's order. Additionally, Section 148(3) of the Act mandates that no prosecution under the Act shall be instituted without the previous sanction of the Registrar or an officer authorized by the State Government. The respondents admitted in their affidavit-in-reply that no such sanction was obtained. The court held that both grounds were valid and that the FIR and subsequent police case were illegal. The court quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Non-Cognizable Offences - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Sections 146(g)(k)(n)(p), 147, 148(3) - FIR registered under Section 147 for offences under Section 146(g)(k)(n)(p) which are punishable with imprisonment up to three years - Held that since none of the offences are punishable with imprisonment exceeding three years, they are non-cognizable under Schedule I of CrPC, and police cannot register FIR without magistrate's order - FIR quashed (Paras 3-6).

B) Criminal Procedure - Sanction for Prosecution - Mandatory Requirement - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Section 148(3) - No prosecution under the Act can be initiated without prior sanction of the Registrar or authorized officer - Held that absence of sanction renders the prosecution invalid - FIR quashed on this ground as well (Paras 2, 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered under Section 147 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 is liable to be quashed for want of sanction under Section 148(3) and because the offences are non-cognizable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The FIR dated 11-08-2010 in Crime No.3118 of 2010 registered with Police Station Pusad (City) under Section 147 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

Law Points

  • Non-cognizable offences cannot be investigated by police without a magistrate's order
  • Sanction under Section 148(3) is mandatory for prosecution under the Act
  • Offences punishable with imprisonment up to three years are non-cognizable under the Code of Criminal Procedure
  • 1973
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (06) 132

Criminal Application No.1799 of 2010

2015-06-22

A.B. Chaudhari, P.N. Deshmukh

Shri H.R. Dhumale, Shri A.S. Mardikar (Amicus Curiae), Shri S.V. Manohar (Advocate General), Smt. B.H. Dangre (Public Prosecutor)

Manoranjan s/o Ramdas Rathod

State of Maharashtra, Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Pusad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.3118/2010 registered under Section 147 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960

Filing Reason

Lack of sanction under Section 148(3) and offences being non-cognizable

Previous Decisions

None mentioned

Issues

Whether the FIR under Section 147 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 is liable to be quashed for want of sanction under Section 148(3)? Whether the offences under Section 146(g)(k)(n)(p) are non-cognizable, making the FIR illegal?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that no sanction under Section 148(3) was obtained and offences are non-cognizable. Respondents admitted in affidavit-in-reply that no sanction was obtained.

Ratio Decidendi

Offences under Section 146(g)(k)(n)(p) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 are non-cognizable as they are punishable with imprisonment up to three years, and no prosecution under the Act can be instituted without prior sanction under Section 148(3).

Judgment Excerpts

We find on the affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondents that no sanction under Section 148(3) was obtained. Since the offences are non-cognizable, the First Information Report could not have been registered by the police.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No.1799 of 2010 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No.3118/2010 registered under Section 147 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court heard the parties and reserved judgment on 20-02-2015, pronouncing it on 22-06-2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: 146(g), 146(k), 146(n), 146(p), 147, 148(3)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Schedule I
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Municipal Councilors in Corruption Case — No Prima Facie Case of Criminal Conspiracy Established. Court held that mere presence at a meeting does not constitute criminal conspiracy under Section 120-B I...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Police Constable Appointment Case — Suppression of Pending Criminal Case in Verification Roll Constitutes Material Suppression Justifying Denial of Appointment. The Court held that a candidate must disclose pend...