NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
Search Results for "SEBI disclosure"
90 result(s) found
Found 90 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Interim Injunction in Pledge Enforcement and Share Transfer Dispute — Application Seeks to Restrain Voting and Transfer Rights Over Pledged Shares. Pledgee Rights Under Section 176 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and SEBI Takeover Code Disclosure Obligations Are Central to Dispute.
4 Sep 2023The matter arose from Interim Application (L) No. 29574 of 2021 filed in Commercial Suit No. 189 of 2022 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State Bank of India in Jet Airways Insolvency Case — Holds Performance Bank Guarantee Cannot Be Adjusted Against Resolution Plan Payment and Non-Implementation Leads to Liquidation. The Court ruled that the SRA's failure to pay airport dues and employee dues constituted non-implementation of the Resolution Plan under Section 33(3) IBC, 2016, and the PBG cannot be set off against the first tranche payment.
13 Nov 2024The case pertains to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways (India) Limited, initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) under S...
- 423
High Court
High Court of Bombay Examines Challenge to Arbitral Award Directing Payment of Rs.9,28,188.45 with Interest. The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from a member-client dispute over stock market transactions and margin shortfalls.
14 Oct 2014The petitioner filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bom...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Bombay Upholds Maintainability of Suit and Rejects Jurisdictional Objection in Shareholder Requisition Dispute. Court Holds That Shareholder-Proposed Resolutions Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013 Are Not Immune From Judicial Scrutiny and Section 430 Does Not Bar Civil Court Jurisdiction When NCLT Lacks Power.
26 Oct 2021The litigation arose from a suit filed by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd, a listed public company, against two institutional investors, Invesco Dev...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Shareholders' EGM Requisition in Zee Entertainment Dispute — Upholds Right to Convene Meeting Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013. Court holds that shareholders holding 17.88% stake have statutory right to requisition EGM for removal of directors and that the company cannot restrain such meeting on grounds of alleged illegalities in proposed resolutions.
22 Mar 2022The case involves an appeal by Invesco Developing Markets Fund and OFI Global China Fund LLC (collectively holding 17.88% of shares in Zee Entertainme...
- 186
High Court
High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Transferor and Transferee Companies Despite Intervenor Objection. Non-Disclosure of Pre and Post Capital Structure in Explanatory Statement Did Not Invalidate Scheme When Shareholders Had Sufficient Information Under Section 393 of Companies Act, 1956.
31 Jan 2006The transferor company, Chemidye Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd., and the transferee company, Thirumalai Chemicals Ltd., both engaged in similar chemi...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioner Company in Reduction of Share Capital Case Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. Court-Ordered Valuation Found Plausible; Minority Objectors Failed to Prove Unfairness.
9 May 2014Cadbury India Limited filed a petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a special resolution for reduction of...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Authority for Advance Ruling's Refusal to Give Ruling on Tax Liability of Capital Gains from Sale of Shares by Mauritius-Based Company. Authority's Order Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction Since Proviso to Section 245R(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Not Attracted.
25 Jul 2012The petitioner, Mahindra BT Investment Co. (Mauritius) Ltd., a company incorporated in Mauritius and a tax resident there, filed an application for ad...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute Over Margin Shortfall and Unauthorized Sale of Shares. Court upholds concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that broker was entitled to sell shares to cover margin deficit under Member Client Agreement and bye-laws of National Stock Exchange.
6 Aug 2015The petitioner, Ankit Bimal Deorah, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award date...
- 97
