Search Results for "Rehabilitation agreement"

310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court directs respondents to issue notice to project affected persons before denying rehabilitation benefits.

The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased project affected person, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to issue a notice unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under Slum Act for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) — Acquisition of Petitioner's Land by Deputy Collector Set Aside for Failure to Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, NESCO Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of its land bearing CT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Works Contracts Held Valid and Disputes Referable to Arbitration.

The applicant, Gold Prism Realty Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Lease Claimants in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Welfare Legislation Overrides Equitable Rights. High Court's Order Setting Aside HPC Decision and Allowing Redevelopment Upheld as Slum Act Takes Precedence Over Prospective Lessees' Claims.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal arising from a slum rehabilitation dispute in Mumbai. The appellants, legal representatives of Lullu Vas, claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...