Search Results for "Recovery of Money"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Recovery of $300,000 in Commercial Contract Dispute. Zee Entertainment's claim for payment under a content licensing agreement upheld against Triller Inc for failure to make payment despite repeated demands.

The plaintiff, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, a public listed company, filed a summary suit in the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered. Court holds that defendant's unconditional leave to defend application is not maintainable as no triable issues raised.

The plaintiff, M/s. Gini Silk Mills Ltd, a manufacturer and supplier of cotton and linen fabrics, filed a Commercial Summary Suit under Order XXXVII o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Money Decree in Summary Suit — Allegation of Fraud Based on Non-Production of Sanctioned Plan Not Entertained. Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Not Exercised as Grievances Were Already Considered and Rejected by Executing Court.

The petitioners, Yadav Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, were defendants in Special Summary Suit No.18 of 2009 filed by M/s J....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Suit for Recovery of Unpaid Amounts and Interest in Construction Contract Dispute. Holds that Delayed Payments Attract Interest Under Section 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Excess Recovery from Mobilisation Advance Must Be Refunded.

The plaintiff, M/s Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the Maharashtra State Police Housing & Welfare Corporation Ltd. for recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Recovery of Money Suit — Guarantor Liability Upheld. Defendant's challenge to concurrent findings on loan guarantee fails as no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC.

The respondent-plaintiff, Karnataka Vikas Grameen Bank, filed a suit (O.S. No.225/1999) against the appellant-defendant for recovery of Rs.20,355/- wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff Partnership Firm in Suit for Recovery of Outstanding Amounts Under Order XXXVII CPC. Defendant's Application for Leave to Defend Rejected Due to Lack of Triable Issues and Failure to Disclose Substantial Defense.

The plaintiff, Harilal & Co., a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed Summary Suit No.3037 of 2007 in the Bombay H...