Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered. Court holds that defendant's unconditional leave to defend application is not maintainable as no triable issues raised.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Gini Silk Mills Ltd, a manufacturer and supplier of cotton and linen fabrics, filed a Commercial Summary Suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendants, Soham Fashion and its partners, seeking recovery of Rs. 2,18,40,204/- along with interest at 24% per annum from 31st March 2019 until realization. The claim was based on goods sold and delivered to the defendants, who had been granted a credit period of 35 days from the date of supply. It was agreed that delay in payment would attract interest at 18% from the 36th day up to 75 days and thereafter at a higher rate. The defendants issued cheques which were dishonoured. The plaintiff filed the suit seeking summary judgment. The defendants applied for unconditional leave to defend. The court, after hearing the plaintiff's counsel, held that the defendants had not raised any triable issues and were not entitled to unconditional leave to defend. Consequently, the court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff for the principal amount of Rs. 2,18,40,204/- with interest at 18% per annum from the date of the suit until realization.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Summary Suit - Order XXXVII CPC - Unconditional Leave to Defend - The court considered whether the defendants had raised any triable issues entitling them to unconditional leave to defend. Held that the defendants failed to disclose any substantial defence or triable issues, and thus were not entitled to unconditional leave. (Paras 1-6)

B) Commercial Law - Recovery of Price - Goods Sold and Delivered - The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 2,18,40,204/- with interest for goods sold and delivered to the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case and granted summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the defendants are entitled to unconditional leave to defend the summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff for the principal amount of Rs. 2,18,40,204/- with interest at 18% per annum from the date of the suit until realization. The defendants are not entitled to unconditional leave to defend.

Law Points

  • Summary judgment under Order XXXVII CPC
  • Unconditional leave to defend
  • Triable issues
  • Commercial dispute
  • Goods sold and delivered
  • Cheque dishonour
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (08) 69

Commercial Summary Suit No. 1296 of 2019

2023-08-29

Kamal Khata, J.

Ms. Akshaya Puthran i/b. S. K. Singhi & Partners LLP for the Plaintiff

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial Summary Suit for recovery of money based on goods sold and delivered and dishonoured cheques.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks summary judgment against defendants for Rs. 2,18,40,204/- with interest at 24% per annum from 31st March 2019 till realization.

Filing Reason

Defendants failed to pay for goods supplied despite credit period and cheques issued were dishonoured.

Issues

Whether the defendants are entitled to unconditional leave to defend the summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff's counsel submitted that the plaintiff is a manufacturer/supplier of fabrics, defendants purchased goods on credit, and cheques were issued but dishonoured. Defendants applied for unconditional leave to defend but raised no triable issues.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Order XXXVII CPC, a defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend only if they disclose a substantial defence or raise triable issues. In the absence of any such defence, summary judgment must be granted.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiff has filed the suit in the Commercial Division under the provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 seeking a summary judgment against the defendants in the sum of Rs. 2,18,40,204/- and further interest at the rate of 24% per annum from 31st March 2019 till the actual realization of the entire claim. Ms. Puthran the learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that the plaintiff is a manufacturer / supplier of cotton and linen fabrics and the defendants are suppliers of fabrics and therefore, needed regular supply of fabrics.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Commercial Summary Suit No. 1296 of 2019 under Order XXXVII CPC. The defendants applied for unconditional leave to defend. The court reserved judgment on 19th July 2023 and pronounced on 29th August 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXXVII
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered. Court holds that defendant's unconditional leave to defend application is not maintainable as no triable issues raise...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Review Before Fees Regulating Authority Under Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Act, 2015. The Court directed the authority to consider the review application on ...