Search Results for "Rape Conviction"

1015 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1015 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape.

The appellant, Sunil Kashinath Shelke, was convicted by the learned District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.41 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Ratan @ Vishvajit Manoranjan Bose, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 363, 366...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecution Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Soma Balkrushna Dadore, was convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376 IPC (rape) and Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Damodhar Rambhau Inchal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 102 of 2008 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Niranjan s/o Vishnu Chavan, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, for an offence punishable under Section 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC; Challenges Correctness of Trial Court's Finding. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Rape of Minor Girl Aged Three Years, Sentenced to Ten Years RI and Compensation.

The present appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated 4.12.2009 by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambejogai in Sessions Case No.21/2008,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...