Search Results for "Railway Construction Contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Railway Construction Contract"

483 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 483 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition in Arbitration Dispute Over Bridge Construction. Arbitral Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Feb 2013

The appellant, Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (owner), entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Oriental Construction Company Limited (co...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Technical Bid in Railway Tender — Petitioner's Bid Wrongly Rejected for Non-Submission of Documents Despite Compliance with Joint Venture Conditions. The court held that the rejection was arbitrary as the petitioner, a joint venture, had complied with the tender conditions applicable to joint ventures, and the respondents had erroneously applied conditions for individual bidders.

24 Aug 2016

The petitioner, M/s K.K. Vidyut, a joint venture, challenged the rejection of its technical bid by the respondent Railways in a tender for supplying m...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Laundry Contract. Petition Questions Recovery Rate for Lost Linen, Delay Penalty, Penalty Cap, and Fixed Cost Compensation Under the Arbitration Act, 1996.

21 Nov 2025

The Central Railway filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 March 2024 ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Public Interest Litigation on Railway Double Tracking Permissions. The Petitioners Contended That Railway Authorities Must Obtain Prior Permissions Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Town and Country Planning Act, 1974, Irrigation Act, 1973, Land Revenue Code, 1968 and CRZ Notification, 2011, and That Section 11 of Railways Act, 1989 Does Not Exempt Such Permissions.

3 Aug 2022

By way of a public interest litigation, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and three residents of Guirdolim, Chandor and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandamus to Enforce Lease Renewal Clause Against Central Railway. Clause 20.1 of Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Automatic Right of Renewal; Railway's Discretion to Invite Fresh Tenders Upheld.

23 Apr 2010

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Parcel Carriers (India) Pvt Ltd and Scorpion Express Pvt Ltd against the Union of India and Central ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Cancellation of Dharavi Redevelopment Tender and Upholds Fresh Tender Process. The court held that the State's decision to cancel the earlier tender and re-tender was a policy decision based on changed circumstances and not arbitrary, and that the petitioner had no vested right to the award of the contract.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioner, SecLink Technologies Corporation, a company incorporated in Seychelles and lead member of a consortium, challenged the cancellation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Despite Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Notice Period. The court held that the respondent's failure to respond to the notice and its conduct constituted waiver of the 30-day notice requirement under Clause 64(3)(b)(ii) of the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract.

3 Apr 2024

The applicant, S. N. Naik & Brothers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with the Union of India (respondent) on 23.09.2019 for constructi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award of Interest in Railway Contract Dispute. Clause 16(2) Prohibiting Interest on Contractual Amounts Does Not Bar Interest on Award Amount Under Section 31(7)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Jan 2013

The appellant, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which was rejected by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 — Dispute Over Price Variation Clause in Construction Contract Referred to Arbitrator. The court held that the dispute regarding the interpretation of Clause 13.6 of the contract is arbitrable and directed reference to arbitration.

14 Dec 2006

The Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (plaintiff) filed an Arbitration Suit under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, seeking reference of disputes...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)