Search Results for "Public Auction Notice"

682 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 682 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging E-Auction Result for Gold Mining Licence Due to Lack of Evidence of Technical Glitch. Petitioner failed to prove portal malfunction prevented bid submission; declaration of preferred bidder upheld.

The petitioner, Kundan Gold Mines Private Limited, challenged a notice dated 12.12.2025 issued by the Director General, Directorate of Geology and Min...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Final Decree Proceedings — Mesne Profits Must Be Determined Before Auction Sale. Held that mesne profits under Section 2(12) CPC are a substantive right that cannot be deferred until after the sale of property in final decree proceedings.

The petitioner, Sri S.P. Suresh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the XV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes E-Auction Notice and Sale Certificate in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Violation of Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Failure to Serve 30-Day Notice Before Auction Renders Sale Void.

The petitioners, Sri T.S. Nataraj, Sri Harsha N., and Smt. N. Seema, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Auction Purchaser Not Liable to Pay Unearned Increase to DDA in Compulsory Acquisition Case. Conversion Charges Refunded as Property Conveyed Was Freehold, Not Leasehold.

The Supreme Court of India heard two cross-appeals arising from a judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 30.03.2016 in LPA No.226 of 2014. The dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Auction and Allotment of Plots by Government Company. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any legal right to allotment and that the auction process was fair and transparent.

The petitioner, Jaykrishna Industries Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, engaged in development and construction, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Land Dispute Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Comply with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC and Decide the Appeal on Merits After Proper Appreciation of Evidence.

The present second appeals arise from a land dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) concerning...