Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"

365 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 365 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Confirmation of Attachment Order Under KPIDFE Act — Financial Establishment's Failure to Repay Depositors Justifies Absolute Attachment. The Court upheld the trial court's order confirming the interim attachment of properties of M/s. Lancer Finance under Section 5(2) of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004, finding no illegality or perversity in the decision.

20 Dec 2024

The case involves an appeal filed under Section 16 of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004 (KPIDFE...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Despite Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Notice Period. The court held that the respondent's failure to respond to the notice and its conduct constituted waiver of the 30-day notice requirement under Clause 64(3)(b)(ii) of the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract.

3 Apr 2024

The applicant, S. N. Naik & Brothers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with the Union of India (respondent) on 23.09.2019 for constructi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defreezing of Bank Account in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 68-F(2) of NDPS Act, 1985. Petitioner's proprietary firm's bank account frozen by DRI in connection with husband's drug trafficking case; court holds that freezing order ceases to operate if not confirmed within 30 days.

27 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Jatinder Kaur Chilotra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 December 202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging AGRC Order Imposing Additional 5% Land Cost on Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project. The court examined the validity of the direction to pay additional land cost due to change in developer under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act and SRA office order.

15 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Gemini Developers, a sole proprietorship concern of Mr. Ramesh Malhotra (predecessor of the present petitioner represented by Mr. Deep...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Bar of Limitation — Claim Under Section 7 IBC Held Time-Barred as Debt Arose Before 2006 and Application Filed in 2018. The court held that the Limitation Act applies to IBC proceedings and the application was filed beyond three years from the date of default.

2 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Radha Exports (India) Pvt. Limited against the judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Company and Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 r/w 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Directors' Claim of Not Being In Charge of Business at Time of Cheque Issuance Fails to Rebut Presumption of Liability Under Section 141.

14 Mar 2017

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s. Jaimin Jewelery Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Accused No.1) and its directors, Gautam Mehta (Accu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Assessment Orders Issued in Trade Name Despite Proprietor's Participation — Estoppel by Conduct Bars Challenge to Notice. The Court held that assessment orders are not non-est merely because notices were issued in the trade name, as the proprietor participated in proceedings without objection.

15 Mar 2016

The case involves multiple sales tax references filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax against M/s. Klip Nail Care and other respondents. The common q...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Assessment of VAT Refund Claims for Three Proprietary Concerns Under Section 48(6) of MVAT Act, 2002. Court Orders Finalization of Assessment for 2007-08 Within Three Months to Enable Set Off or Refund of Excess Input Tax Credit.

4 Feb 2015

The petitioners, three proprietary concerns, filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench seeking a direction to the respondents ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi — Complainant Not Proprietor or Holder in Due Course. The court held that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, must be filed by the holder in due course or the authorized power of attorney holder, and the appellant, who falsely claimed to be the proprietor, had no locus standi.

19 Sep 2013

The appellant, Upendra Devendra Lad, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondents, including M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Suit — Limitation Period for Suit by Electricity Board Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Article 14. Suit for recovery of arrears of electricity charges filed within three years of demand notice held within limitation; interest rate reduced from 18% to 12% p.a.

23 Sep 2010

The appeal was filed by M/s. G.T. Iron & Steel Works (original defendants) against the judgment and decree dated 15th June 2002 passed by the Civil Ju...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)