Search Results for "Preferential Qualification"

63 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 63 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by Apprentices Seeking Absorption as Regular Officers Under Apprentices Act, 1961. No Automatic Right to Absorption Exists Under Section 22(1) of the Act, and Employer Retains Discretion in Recruitment, with Writ Jurisdiction Limited to Policy Enforcement.

The petitioners, who were appointed as Graduate Apprentice Trainees by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) in 2016-2017, filed a writ petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Class-IV Employees Terminated Due to Irregular Selection Process. Appointment Based on Interview Without Advertisement Provision Held Invalid; Termination Upheld as Selection Was De Hors the Rules.

The case pertains to a batch of appeals by employees appointed as Class-IV employees in Palamu district, Jharkhand, pursuant to an advertisement dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Temporary AEEs in Panchayat Raj Department — Quashes High Court Order Striking Down Regularization G.O.M. No. 262. Seniority of Pre-1994 Appointees Must Be Counted from Initial Appointment Date, Not Below Later Recruits.

The case involves appeals by temporary Assistant Executive Engineers (AEEs) appointed between 1990-1992 in the Panchayat Raj Department of Andhra Prad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Age Relaxation and Bonus Marks for Project Teachers in Prabodhak Recruitment. Rule 13(v) of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 Upheld as Valid and Not Discriminatory.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of 47 appeals challenging the selection of candidates for the post of 'Prabodhak' (teacher) under the Rajasthan Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows APSC Appeal in Recruitment Norms Change Case — Rules Existing on Advertisement Date Govern Selection. Savings Clause in 2019 Procedure Valid; Ongoing Recruitment Must Be Completed Under 2010 Rules.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) against the judgment of the Gauhati High Court which had stru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Age Relaxation: Cannot Claim General Category Seat. Age Relaxation Under Gujarat Policy Is a Relaxation in Standard, Not a Mere Concession, and Candidates Availing It Must Be Adjusted Against Reserved Posts.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana against the Gujarat Public Service Commission and others, upholding the D...