Search Results for "Power Market Regulations 2010"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Power Market Regulations 2010"

461 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

17 Jan 2012

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against CCI's Investigation Order in Competition Act Case. Broadcasters Challenge Order Under Section 26(1) Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Application of Mind.

16 Oct 2019

Star India Private Limited and Sony Pictures Network India Private Limited filed writ petitions challenging an order dated 27 July 2018 passed by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Settlement Regulations and Rejection of Settlement Proposal. Internal Committee's Power to Impose Conditions Precedent Upheld as Valid and Not Ultra Vires.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Abans Enterprises Ltd. and its promoter Abhishek Bansal, challenged the validity of regulations 6(1)(f) and 13(2)(ba) of the Securiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes State Government's Order Cancelling Postponement of APMC Elections and Appointment of Administrator. Government's Action Held Arbitrary for Ignoring Court's Earlier Direction to Hold Village-Level Society Elections First Under Section 14(3-A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

2 Mar 2010

The petitioners, comprising the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Ralegaon, its Vice-Chairman, and an agriculturist, challenged two orders:...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Organon (India) Limited — Scheme Approved Despite Objection Regarding Valuation and Fairness. Court held that the reduction was fair and reasonable, and the objection regarding valuation was not sustainable as the price was based on SEBI delisting guidelines and accepted by majority shareholders.

7 Jun 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Scheme Petition filed by Organon (India) Limited seeking sanction and confirmation of a special resolution passed by i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

7 Apr 2025

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Wartsila India Limited — Court Approves Special Resolution for Reduction of Share Capital to Provide Exit to Minority Shareholders, Rejecting Oppression Allegations. The Court held that the reduction was bona fide and not oppressive, and confirmed the reduction under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 1956.

15 Nov 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Petition filed by Wartsila India Limited (WIL) seeking confirmation of a special resolution passed on 10th November 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Revaluation of Lease Premium and Ground Rent for Commercial Plots. The court upheld CIDCO's power to revise lease terms based on current market rates under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, rejecting claims of estoppel and legitimate expectation.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by commercial plot allottees in Navi Mumbai challenging the decision of the City and Industrial Devel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

8 Dec 2016

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)