Search Results for "Patta Mutation"

53 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Settlement Deed Set Aside for Fraud and Misrepresentation. Continuous Possession and Revenue Records Support Plaintiff's Claim Over Sister's Alleged Fraudulent Deed.

The case involves a property dispute between two sisters, Mahalakshmi (original plaintiff, now deceased) and Rajeswari (first defendant). The suit pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings Affirmed. Daughter's claim for 1/5th share in ancestral property fails as property was sold by father during his lifetime and plaintiff had already received consideration in a prior family partition.

The appellant, Venkatalakshmiamma, filed a suit for partition of 1/5th share in the suit property, claiming it was ancestral property of her father Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Reverses Appellate Court's Dismissal and Restores Trial Court's Decree. Held that the appellate court erred in reversing the trial court's judgment without properly considering the evidence regarding possession and title.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a suit for bare injunction in O.S.No.52 of 2008 before the District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur, seeking to restrain ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition and Remits Mutation Order to Tahsildar for Fresh Consideration Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Mutation Order Passed Without Notice to Legal Heirs of Deceased Co-Pattadar Violated Principles of Natural Justice and Was Set Aside.

The petitioner, A.Vellaiappan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the proceed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit, Restores Concurrent Findings of Trial and First Appellate Court. High Court's Reversal Set Aside for Reappreciating Evidence Beyond Second Appeal Scope Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over possession of agricultural land. The plaintiff, Rajendra Kumar Gupta, filed a suit for recovery of possession based o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...